Topaz Video 1.4.0

Yes, there’s a benefit in first using SLM as this one cleans the sources extremely well (while SLP doesn’t eliminate e.g. chroma noise as good).

But on the downside SLM mangles text and then SLP can only go forward with the already distorted and/or wrong glyphs. See your example above: “set you pree” just doesn’t look well, even if it is razor sharp.

The error (replacing the F with a P was done in the first SLM step and in my experience this happens only extremely seldom with SLP).

Here’s another example where SLP handles text/logos extremely well in a low res source:

Original:

SLP:

SLM while eliminating the chroma noise much better fails quite miserably with the “Access all areas” logo. And a later SLP step won’t recover the original text.

4 Likes

I don’t see any transitions with 10 frame overlap.

And scene detection would be very good option, but as we all see, SeedVR2 is abandoned now, so we have what we have.

It is? Didn’t know that. Quite a pity as there was quite some potential in it.

Another comparison between SLM and SLP.

The original is 1280x720, but the real resolution is much lower. Downscaling to 414x308, SeedVR2 to 1242x924 and Starlight Mini or Precise afterwards.

Original:

SLM after Seed:

SLP after Seed:

Font rendering is crispier with SLP, without doubt.

Original:

SLM after Seed:

SLP after Seed:

It’s sharper and has more detailed textures, which causes to highlight areas in focus and blur out of focus areas. I like this separation.

Original:

SLM after Seed:

SLP after Seed:

Luckily for us, there’s no weird textures at the moving parts of the image.

Conclusion: I like SLP. Sometimes it produces too sharp results, and I’d be happy with something between SLM and SLP.

3 Likes

Both authors are busy now:

1 Like

The Topaz docs classify compute 8.9 as a “recommendation” for SLP 2.5, not as a “requirement”.

As for noise reduction, why not use Nyx-3 or even Denoise?
Neither an upgrade nor an enhancement—just a clean power source for any Starlight model.

Guys, Precise 2.5. it’s Astra 2, yes?

None of them are able to clean up really bad, especially old analog sources as well as SLM. Iris LQ V1 is coming near but has the issue with sometimes creating monster faces (what SLM and especially SLP avoid most of the time).

But yes, I’m going to try Iris LQ V1 as a general cleaner preparation step with a second SLP run to see if the SLP run can alleviate the monster faces issue. This would also be of course MUCH faster than the SLM - SLP procedure.

1 Like

When text is that important (no alien fonts) then doing SLM first is no option.

1 Like

exactly, that’s why I wrote that SLM could be a good template for SLP, especially when the template is noisy—but unfortunately SLM also generates alien fonts, which SLP then adopts.

BTW, here’s one example for the “dirty” faces effect with SLP. This is one example that surely would benefit greatly from a first SLM pass:

Still quite some improvement when compared to the original:

2 Likes

If you have ever set the temporal_overlap value in SeedVR2 to, for example, 16, then the jumps between batches will be much smoother.

Yes, I know. But the issue with having to split the source to e.g. 5 minute chunks and rejoining them afterwards remains.

And with that approach there WILL be jumps at the seeming points (as neither the previous nor the following segment can have intel about the other.

Been there, done that…

1 Like

Thank you for that information! So I should note this is a direct rip from the DVD source, nothing has changed. So the source file weirdly enough is 704 instead of 720. Voyager has variable frame rates so I’m going to encode the file to mp4 and without the variable frame rate to see if that fixes things. I did do one immediate thing it suggested and that was to remove the file to make sure trimming was not on.. closed Topaz, reopened and placed the file into the source again (from an empty source area) and it still immediately crashed. I’m also guessing that rotation = 3 is directly from the source since I used makemkv to pull from the DVD to an mkv file. Nothing really should have changed.

No, the docs specifies this as a minimum requirement.

I’ve also submitted a clip with the same problem that will be useful for testing. Starlight Precise is getting some amazing results, and it will be even better once this problem is ironed out.

Just stunning! :slight_smile:

1 Like

That doc contradicts other help docs, and the post at the top of this thread.

Topaz staff need to clarify this.

Am I using nyx as a denoiser correctly? I set retain detail to 100, set to manual, then estimate on more or less the frame that is most consistent for the video, then bring sharpness down to 0?

I was told this is to denoise it and leave it clean for starlight mini to work off of and not add anything to disrupt it or confuse it.

“Not supported” doesn’t mean it won’t work. It just means that if it doesn’t the devs aren’t going to look for a solution.

1 Like