Writing here to notify that there will be an update to the EULA with clarified terms to address some of these concerns that will be released with the upcoming TPAI v3.2.2 patch as well as the next Gigapixel patch and Video AI patch.
Thanks for the link.
Could someone give an example of âlimited featuresâ if you decide not to upgrade?
âUsage of the software under a perpetual license will continue to be covered under the EULA and usage of the software will be allowed even after expiry of the Initial Term, however the user will not be able to update versions of the software released outside of the Term; this may limit usage of certain features or customer support capabilities and Topaz may not fully support certain superseded app versions or features due to technical limitations.â
The EULA is still not very clear on recurring payments.
For example, if you are a Personal User and you have payment information on file, then at the end of your software term, are you automatically charged for the next version/update (similar to a magazine subscription)? Are you notified in advance?
Basically, the EULA is poorly worded. It seems it would be better to have two EULAâs rather than one that tries to cover everything.
Hello - no sir, you will not be charged for a recurring purchase if you only buy a one-time âperpetualâ license seat. This is now very clear in the EULA.
At the end of your 1 year period of updates you may purchase a renewal or upgrade license, the same as before. There is no change here.
There may also be other products you can purchase which could have recurring payment terms, or other license arrangements which are recurring such as Gigapixel Pro. But rest assured, the perpetual standard offering will remain like before.
I canât imagine any sane person agreeing to this.
While some details were clarified to the minimum possible extent to assuage the concerns of some users, it sure looks like the type of agreement to avoid.
Iâm not sure if this one is worse, or the same but under âIndemnityâ:
I am not a lawyer, but it appears to say that if someone sues Topaz in relation to my use or misuse of the product⊠Not only am I responsible for any losses or costs incurred by Topaz, but they can defend or settle the case as they please, and still keep me responsble for what they determine. Who would agree to that? If I am misunderstanding this, please explain.
The section about âPublicity Righsâ remains unchanged. It says "Publicity Rights.
You hereby grant Topaz the right to use Your name or your organizationâs
name, logo, or trademarks in any advertising, publicity, marketing, or other promotional
materials or activities (âPublicity Rightsâ)."
Then it says those with âProfessional Licensesâ, which are expensive subscriptions can opt-out. Any of the rest of us would have to delete all copies of the software and stop using it. I DO NOT great this right to Topaz!
What appears to be the final and perhaps worst insult is near the end in a section called âAmmendment.â As I understand this, they can change the terms, and you are bound by them unless you delete stop using and delete all copies of the software. Is it my imagination, or does this mean they can change the rules anytime and I would be bound by it, even without downloading or installing a new version. Again, why would I do that?
If my reading of the legalese is incorrect, please let me know, but parts of this seem very clear and vary bad.
Donât get me wrong â Topaz has some excellent software, but others make similar things and are catching up in many ways, and ahead in some. I hope there is a way to stay with Topaz, but at the moment, old versions, ON1 and DxO are looking better and better.
Do you see the words Topaz Photo AI v.3.2.1 on the top of this discussion page (in bold)?
If you look just below that bolded text there should be pale gray text that reads âTopaz Photo AIâ & âReleasesâ.
If you click on that pale gray Topaz Photo AI it should bring up a list of the 3 most recent releases. You should be able to go back to 3.2.0 with one of those installers. BUT, I recommend you uninstall your 3.2.1 before you re-install 3.2.0 (just to be on the safe side). You typically donât have to uninstall to move forward, but generally when going back itâs a good idea.
It might not be a bad idea to download the installers as they are rolled out and keep a few on hand (aka, on your computer) as âinsuranceâ in case you want to roll back and donât want to hassle finding an installer prior to the most current three. Just a thought.
That sounds like Adobeâs subscription plan. It is auto-renew for their comprehensive suite of feature-rich products. They notify subscribers 2 weeks in advance of the renewal date.
As written, the perpetual license in the EULA will still allow you to hold an indefinite license to a version of our software like we always have with a single non-recurring payment. If we were to implement an auto-renewal or subscriptions in the future for our 3 main apps, it would be optional/opt-in.
Hey Sam - you are actually reading an example of this - an amendment to the EULA in order to address needed updates, with some of it even based on your feedback. We will be providing this updated EULA in the next patch for Photo AI, and thatâs the mechanism that is written about.
I canât address every concern or interpretation for every line in the EULA in this thread but Iâll look at publishing an FAQ in a future thread as someone above had suggested.
I preferred buying the boxed releases I wanted. They were annual & I didnât feel the need to get each one b/c they skewed to different target audiences. If more feature rich for illustrators one year, Iâd skip it. If robust, helpful new features for photographers Iâd get it. Generally worked out to every other year. I still donât install every Ps interim release. Especially since I always research for serious Win issues 1st.
And, theyâre clearly going in the direction of dummying down Ps & adding all sorts of âtraining wheelsâ features that seem as though they should be in Ps Elements.