then it’s the same GPU as the RTX2070 (vanilla), with waaaay lower clocks (very close to the RTX2070 max-Q) and less memory, no need for benchmarks
uncool and low priority! there are more important features to be added first.
Hi mistdragon, you’re one of the lucky guy who has RTX3080 in hand. Appreciate if you could post some benchmark on 352x240 / 352x288 (VCD), 720x480 / 720x756 (DVD) Upscale 200%. On RTX2060 VCDs are 0.10s / frame, DVDs are 0.30s / frame. I wonder if RTX3080 can process 4 times faster, because the CUDA counts 4 times over RTX2060. If not, how fast it really can go? Is it worth buying to speed up the process? Thanks.
anyone could tell me is it not working on RTX3080 ? i just change my display card and keep loading on perpareing in 5mins screen , thanks all guy 
I will test the speed if i’ll get it to work properly. For now, it only managed to run once and produced corrupted frames. I’ll check other models and if it will work on any of them, i’ll run speed benchmarks.
I’ve had the same problem which makes me think it’s not my mGPU setup that’s at fault. I suggest you try running the proccess using VEAI. It runs after ~10 minutes of initializing, but produces corrupted frames on my machine. I’m curious to see if it’s my problem or it you can repeat it on your 3080 too.
Thank you for the information.
GeForce RTX 3080 costs about $1000 in Japan at the shop price, so I can’t afford it for a poor person like me.
For your reference, I would appreciate it if you could tell me how many seconds per frame can be processed in the following settings.
SIZE: 1920×1080, SCALE: 100%, Gaia-CG
Please take your time.
0.41 per frame
Thank you for the information.
That’s great!
On my PC, it’s 13-15 sec./frame.
(Ryzen 5 3600)
I don’t play PC games, so I haven’t needed the luxury of a GPU in the past, but I would consider replacing it with the GeForce RTX 3000 series.
Anyone has benchmark table for various GPUs? Are CUDA cores count matters for speed? I do not use GPU for playing games, but rather for scaling videos. Please advice.
a benchmark table is available on the facebook beta group for VEAI
I just almost (got) a heart attack when I saw the upgrade yearly price for VEAI tonight for the first time…
I tought at first it was a joke. i’m very sad, i was not aware of such a price after the topic of the topaz “boss” about the change in the upgrade plan, telling that all software will have upgrade price between 49 and 99" per year… but didn’t know it would be 200 for VEAI…
it’s something i can’t afford… and will certainly have to leave… i hope some discount on the upgrade will maybe happen one day…
paying the upgrade more expensive than what i bought is just impossible…
1 Like
thanks @Martyprod i’ll take a look at the FB group. The price is indeed high, but still it is worth the price of the given quality and updates constantly. I think you can look for discount codes available, when I bought, I got 30% off the price.
I already have an 25% EDU discount, and it’s still too much expensive unfortunatly. I don’t regret it was a nice experience and a very beautiful software, would love to continy, i’m still there until march, the actual situation in the wold etc ask choice to be made. We’ll see. i had the chance to get a 100$ discount of VEAI, so paid 99$, but would have never imagined the updgrade would be 200. it’s as worst as Vegas Pro, and i refused it for them too… Magix opened to me the EDU purchase (50%) and could get it at an ok price. but 25% Edu is unfortunatly not enough. we’ll see in the future. thx.
Private
Only members can see who’s in the group and what they post
Visible
Anyone can find this group.
Real user friendly.
2 Likes
You’ll have to subscribe to the group to have access to it. If you don’t want, i can’t help.
1 Like
But why these benchmark tables aren’t available in the first place on the Topaz Labs VEAI web page ? This should be there, when you sell a product customers should know what to expect with their own hardware and help decide when to buy new hardware.
I don’t have facebook and will never create any account there.
2 Likes
The tables are user created and not reliable since they aren’t using the same source video to test across hardware.
I have a Facebook account and I don’t use it much, I immediately made the assumption it’s an invite only kind of situation. I completely missed the “join” button. You still have to be approved after clicking it, but I got added pretty quickly.
I don’t much like social media. I know for example many people report that Facebook might all of a sudden decide to message a person and tell them that unless they send in all kinds of private information (scans of driver’s license, etc.), they will lose their account. So I don’t want to rely on anything like that. I’ve been on the Internet since the mid 1990s so the very idea of sending some website your personal info, and posting all of your personal info and details publicly for the world to see, is insane.
Sorry for the derail. 
2 Likes
