Only recently have I tested the Apollo Fast, which is very different from the Apollo even though the name is Fast.
The advantage is that the details of the input source are preserved much better than Apollo. Unfortunately, the rest are almost all shortcomings, the effect of frame interpolation is inferior to Apollo (not all), more rectangles (any scene may appear, global or local), speed difference is not obvious, etc.
The results of both Apollo models are suboptimal, and they handle rotated frames poorly.
