Topaz Video AI Alpha v4.0.8.0.a (Proteus v4)

Hello everyone,

We have an Alpha build to test the new Proteus-v4 model.

4.0.8.0.a


Proteus v4

In this new version, we aimed to expand the capability of the current Proteus by handling more severe cases (e.g. more noise, compression, etc) and more input video types (progressive, interlaced, and interlaced progressive). This version can also enhance human faces better than the Proteus v3. While the Iris model is dedicated to face enhancement, Proteus v4 would be the model to handle all face and non-face inputs equally well. Please test this new version and let us know your comments.

Changelog from Proteus v3

  • Handles more noise and compression
  • Improves faces
  • Works on interlaced and interlaced progressive videos as well
  • Better results on Auto
  • More details and temporal consistency

Send us your feedback

  • Please let us know what areas you suggest to improve
  • Submit Files :
    – Send us a short few seconds of input video and the corresponding output
    – Share the ffmpeg command or settings that you used
    – Leave a short note on what was the issue (e.g. artifact) or what you want to improve
    – Any comparison video/screenshot with any of our existing model
  • Please also share what you like about this model so that we do not compromise that aspect of the model in the next checkpoint

Thank you so much!

9 Likes

Great! Now we just need the “preserve text” functionality from TPAI to help with watermarks on video from getting over-processed with the likes of Proteus, that does really well with many other things. :grinning:

My initial observation of Proteus v4 is that dehaloing/denoising seems to be extremely strong (even if manually set to zero), and can remove significant detail.

Edit: The strength of the dehaloing seems to be the overriding feature.

1 Like

Wouldn’t it be a good idea to merge Proteus and Iris together to get the best of both models into one? It could be named Ireus or Protis. :smile:

5 Likes

What resolution and quality of input are you using it on?

At last! A model to replace the old Proteus v3!
This model seems to do a better job in details than Iris - although Iris seems to do better in some ways.
Here is a comparison of the original vs Proteus v4.

Here is a comparison of Proteus v4 vs Iris LQ.

Proteus v4 seems to do a better job on the bird than Iris, but it also adds a texture that wasn’t there to the leaves. While Iris makes leaves look more like they’re supposed to.

5 Likes

I initially tried 480p to 1080p, on a low to mid quality source (somewhat oversharpened VHS transfer). The dehaloing removed a bit too much detail and made the output a bit soft, even with high sharpening and debluring. Probably better off with Iris v2 or Proteus v3 on that.

I’ve since tried 540p to 1080p, on a better quality source. The dehaloing is less intrusive and the output seems free of artifacts, but not something that couldn’t be achieved with Proteus v3.

At the moment I’m not seeing a reason to use this model over another. When I’ve tested more I’ll try to put some images together that show this.

2 Likes

I’ve found that in Proteus v4 there can be detail artifacting with fast motion which Proteus v3 doesn’t seem to suffer from.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0a69ttlyytoi3pssuxotl/Fast-Motion.mp4?rlkey=mdfltt6fhr6h5lhdd27uu0lxn&dl=0

2 Likes

Tests in FFMPEG’s testsrc.
Color borders distortion is reduced when compared to Proteus v3, Iris, etc.
For example, it is easy to see the difference in distortion between light blue and purple, and yellow and yellow-green.
I will test how the effect will be seen in the real video.

Prob-4 2x
testsrc-prob4-2x_015

Prob-3 2x
testsrc-prob3-2x_015

Iris-2 2x
testsrc-iris2-2x_015

Gcg-5 2x
testsrc-gcg5-2x_015

Ghq-5 2x
testsrc-ghq5-2x_015

3 Likes

No black spots occurred.
However, the image is quite unnatural and artificial.
The parameters are all set to 0 for both Prob-3 and Prob-4.

Prob-4 4x

Prob-3 4x

2 Likes

Tested 4x with animation.
The images are sharp but unnatural.
Parameters are all 0.

Prob-4 4x


Prob-3 4x

Lanczos 4x

2 Likes
  • I made a complete model download via the download manager but even then it was loading a model before I got a preview!
  • When I adjust my enhancement settings the zoom level of the preview and original is reset.
  • The generated preview is only shown automatically the first maybe three previews. The next previews are not shown before I actively select them from the list (same behaviour reported to the recent beta). Switching to a different model sometimes solves the issue temporary (maybe for another three previews?).
  • When I move the view point via mouse and the mouse reaches the left edge of the preview the preview resets the zoom level (reported before in different beta versions).
  • I can sort the exports in different orders but not the Previews, for example to show the latest preview on the top!
  • things and faces in the background are sometimes replaced, faces by sharp zombie like faces. sometimes only the eyes:

2 Likes

Proteus V4 somehow seems a bit like Iris V1.7 being somewhere in between Iris LQ and MQ - which per se isn’t that bad.

Text and Logos seem to come through better than with Iris.

2 Likes

thank you for this proteus v4 model, it seems to work miracles on my sd sequences and even my go pro sequences, or old sd clips. it preserves all the details and improves the face much better than iris in my opinion. I will continue to test it :slight_smile:

2 Likes

Initial runs of Proteus v4 seem crisper. And faster on my aging (5 year old!) workstation.

Topaz Video AI Alpha  v4.0.8.0.a
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6132 CPU @ 2.60GHz  63.71 GB
GPU: Radeon (TM) Pro WX 5100 Graphics  7.9795 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro W5700  7.9605 GB
Processing Settings
device: 1 vram: 1 instances: 0
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results	
Proteus-4		1X: 05.59 fps 2X: 03.60 fps 4X: 01.36 fps 	
Proteus		    1X: 04.09 fps 2X: 02.49 fps 4X: 00.98 fps
1 Like

I, for one, welcome the model managers! As I work exclusively offline as I only go online for acquisition and info mostly.

Looking forward to cracking proteus 4 open and see how well it holds up against the previous model!

1 Like

proteus v4 is the best! as soon as I can renew my license, I do so because it is much superior to iris and proteus v3 :slight_smile:

3 Likes

After further testing I still prefer Iris LQ for difficult material as it has less artificial “details” and also much less “crawling ants”.
And less plastic/oil paint look (with the right settings).

Wish there was a way to increase temporal stability regarding noise. I still see “shimmering” with stationary objects. That and compression artifacts, even when set to 100 are still an issue with Proteus v4.

3 Likes