Well, it’s embarrassing, but I’m gonna say it.
I installed a PCIe USB card in PCIEX16_2, and it was sharing bandwidth with PCIEX16_1.
I totally forgot about it.
I’ve now relocated the USB card to PCIEX1_3.
The GPU was running at PCIe 3.0 x8.
Great men make great mistakes. lol
Not by much, and not across all models.
There is an improvement in the first three (Artemis, Iris, and Proteus),
but the others are about the same.
The real difference, which was a big surprise, was with WAN 2.2.
Videos are now created 50% faster.
It was already blazing fast.
Now it’s a night and day difference.
Kudos to Asus for releasing another BIOS update in February
for my ancient 9-year-old B350-F Gaming lol
Would it be possible to automatically include the # of CPU, GPU and Neural Engine cores in the benchmark output when the information is available? This would help us make better purchase decisions.
Thank you!
P.S. thanks to those who have included the information manually!
Okay, but you’re still at IRIS (my favorite model for enhancing) from 27.9 to 33.7 fps.
That’s over 20%, so it was worth it.
The best results with RTX5080 were probably achieved by shaw-ialmaeda with the i7-14700K, but that’s not really significantly more; that’s probably the performance limit of the 5080.
The best value for money for TOPAZ VIDEO at the moment is probably the RTX5070Ti.
(costs half as much and delivers 90% of the 5080’s performance, or something like that…)
… Unfortunately, these dream values don’t apply to 4K,
… but I almost exclusively work in or scale to 4K, so it really goes downhill from there…
… pitch black
… I’m usually in favor of only posting 1080 values here—for clarity and better comparability…
… but just for fun, here are the 4K values from my ancient machine:
I re-ran mine at 4K given most of my input files are at that resolution. Quite a few error out compared to @andymagee-52287 above as an example with their 5070 Ti that fare a little better:
I have and you’re not wrong: 9070 XT is around £600-650 here whereas the 5070 Ti is currently hovering around £800-900. The 5080 is £1200, so yes from a performance per FPS standpoint my 9070 XT is good.
But, I can’t run Proteus Natural or Starlight on it. Proteus Natural seems to run out of VRAM and system RAM almost instantly with a 4K input video. I saw the VRAM fill to 16GB instantly with that model, and a further 39-41GB of system ram was pulled in alongside (!). My render FPS was 0.03 so I abandon it.
I also can’t run Starlight Mini at all, again due to needing 22GB or more VRAM. Given 2 very advanced models outstrip my hardware completely, any upgrade price to say a 5090 could be argued as worth it given my current FPS output with those models is zero.
For Topaz Video in 1080 or 2160, there are only:
RTX: 4090 (if already available), 5070TI, 5080, and 5090…
everything else is completely unsuitable for modern formats or longer projects…
… Professional cards are useful for diffusion models, but they are of no use for the others…
Since the computer is basically blocked forever with Topaz, the cheapest option for semi-professional use would definitely be to buy a second computer with a small motherboard and an RTX 5070TI…
then it doesn’t matter if it runs a few hours longer… surely cheaper than buying a 5090 for that reason?
… I’ll also get a 5090 as soon as there are processors with a decent RAM controller—8000 or better 10,000 MT/s certified—there aren’t any! ! …
INTEL is asleep! ! Everyone is asleep! !
… But I’ll keep the computer with the 5080 for Topaz;
.. I need the 5090 for more real-time performance in DaVinci (6K; 8K VR) …