Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Mac v13.04
CPU: Apple M1 Max 32 GB
GPU: Apple M1 Max 21.333 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: **0.1** instances: 1
Input Resolution: 640x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 31.83 fps 2X: 21.34 fps 4X: 07.67 fps
Proteus 1X: 32.19 fps 2X: 21.67 fps 4X: 07.27 fps
Gaia 1X: 10.58 fps 2X: 07.62 fps 4X: 05.99 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 29.29 fps APFast: 102.00 fps Chronos: 12.54 fps CHFast: 17.59 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Mac v13.04
CPU: Apple M1 Max 32 GB
GPU: Apple M1 Max 21.333 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: **0.1** instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 33.06 fps 2X: 22.50 fps 4X: 09.03 fps
Proteus 1X: 35.05 fps 2X: 21.49 fps 4X: 07.67 fps
Gaia 1X: 10.71 fps 2X: 07.87 fps 4X: 06.56 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 28.31 fps APFast: 111.62 fps Chronos: 12.63 fps CHFast: 17.67 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Mac v13.04
CPU: Apple M1 Max 32 GB
GPU: Apple M1 Max 21.333 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: **0.9** instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 24.21 fps 2X: 15.42 fps 4X: 04.42 fps
Proteus 1X: 23.47 fps 2X: 13.43 fps 4X: 05.24 fps
Gaia 1X: 07.70 fps 2X: 05.81 fps 4X: 04.68 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 23.59 fps APFast: 89.52 fps Chronos: 08.98 fps CHFast: 12.96 fps
Note that 720x480 is consistently faster than 640x480. Go figure. Also, for SD upscaling on Apple Silicon, we are still getting significantly faster processing by minimizing the memory.
If we were allowed to reduce the memory below 0.1 then perhaps 640x480 might be faster than 720x480?
Andy
westend79
June 18, 2023, 4:22pm
22
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900K 63.773 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 23.77 GB
Processing Settings
device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 0
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 23.59 fps 2X: 12.31 fps 4X: 03.42 fps
Proteus 1X: 21.08 fps 2X: 10.94 fps 4X: 03.17 fps
Gaia 1X: 08.01 fps 2X: 05.41 fps 4X: 03.28 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 27.30 fps APFast: 53.83 fps Chronos: 18.16 fps CHFast: 26.28 fps
pbzh
June 18, 2023, 4:23pm
23
Here some benchmarks with my M1 Pro 16GB running the macos 14 Sonoma. The benchmarks are with v3.3.0 and beta v3.3.1.b. one run is with memory usage at 100% and the other at 50%.
westend79
June 18, 2023, 4:28pm
24
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900K 63.773 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 23.77 GB
Processing Settings
device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 0
Input Resolution: 640x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 127.20 fps 2X: 60.99 fps 4X: 18.92 fps
Proteus 1X: 111.80 fps 2X: 56.49 fps 4X: 17.99 fps
Gaia 1X: 44.97 fps 2X: 32.51 fps 4X: 21.34 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 120.13 fps APFast: 216.66 fps Chronos: 96.15 fps CHFast: 125.66 fps
westend79
June 18, 2023, 4:40pm
25
Some benchmarks of the new MacBook Air 15´ would be wonderful.
DaveL
June 18, 2023, 9:04pm
26
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0Input Resolution: 640x480 Benchmark Results
Input Resolution: 480x360 Benchmark Results
Agreed absolutely, but whoever does, please include at least one SD / DVD input resolution for comparison with memory set to 10% (i.e. fastest for SD).
Thanks.
Andy
Mac Studio with M2 Max
1920x1080 FHD:
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Mac v13.04
CPU: Apple M2 Max 64 GB
GPU: Apple M2 Max 48 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 11.38 fps 2X: 07.18 fps 4X: 02.36 fps
Proteus 1X: 10.96 fps 2X: 06.76 fps 4X: 02.36 fps
Gaia 1X: 03.39 fps 2X: 02.53 fps 4X: 01.97 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 09.34 fps APFast: 32.94 fps Chronos: 03.69 fps CHFast: 06.11 fps
720x480:
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Mac v13.04
CPU: Apple M2 Max 64 GB
GPU: Apple M2 Max 48 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 39.61 fps 2X: 21.42 fps 4X: 07.99 fps
Proteus 1X: 34.81 fps 2X: 21.62 fps 4X: 06.36 fps
Gaia 1X: 20.01 fps 2X: 12.92 fps 4X: 08.75 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 52.24 fps APFast: 164.79 fps Chronos: 11.53 fps CHFast: 15.85 fps
1 Like
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor 63.729 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 15.688 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 3840x2160
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 06.32 fps 2X: 02.94 fps 4X: 00.80 fps
Proteus 1X: 05.68 fps 2X: 02.82 fps 4X: 00.81 fps
Gaia 1X: 02.31 fps 2X: 01.57 fps 4X: 00.84 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 12.15 fps APFast: 16.79 fps Chronos: 05.14 fps CHFast: 09.94 fps
Thanks for including results for an SD input resolution. Could I ask a favour, please - any chance of uploading the results of the 720x480 again with memory reduced to the minimum 10% to see the increase in speed.
Many thanks.
Andy
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor 63.729 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 15.688 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 30.74 fps 2X: 12.22 fps 4X: 03.25 fps
Proteus 1X: 26.53 fps 2X: 11.95 fps 4X: 03.18 fps
Gaia 1X: 10.87 fps 2X: 07.39 fps 4X: 03.38 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 38.52 fps APFast: 55.73 fps Chronos: 23.96 fps CHFast: 32.14 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor 63.729 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 15.688 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 147.54 fps 2X: 68.45 fps 4X: 17.24 fps
Proteus 1X: 124.14 fps 2X: 60.90 fps 4X: 17.36 fps
Gaia 1X: 60.58 fps 2X: 42.68 fps 4X: 23.04 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 170.20 fps APFast: 325.95 fps Chronos: 131.59 fps CHFast: 162.67 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor 63.729 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 15.688 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 0.1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 99.34 fps 2X: 62.36 fps 4X: 19.44 fps
Proteus 1X: 89.50 fps 2X: 59.29 fps 4X: 16.76 fps
Gaia 1X: 38.82 fps 2X: 28.90 fps 4X: 18.79 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 98.84 fps APFast: 164.27 fps Chronos: 71.75 fps CHFast: 85.17 fps
1 Like
Mac Studio M2 Max, benchmarks upthread were with Max memory set to 100%. Now set to 10% memory setting:
Why would speed increase for SD in this case?!?
FHD
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Mac v13.04
CPU: Apple M2 Max 64 GB
GPU: Apple M2 Max 48 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 0.1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 08.07 fps 2X: 05.63 fps 4X: 02.38 fps
Proteus 1X: 07.99 fps 2X: 05.59 fps 4X: 02.23 fps
Gaia 1X: 02.47 fps 2X: 01.82 fps 4X: 01.43 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 07.15 fps APFast: 30.80 fps Chronos: 02.85 fps CHFast: 04.23 fps
720x480
Topaz Video AI v3.3.0
System Information
OS: Mac v13.04
CPU: Apple M2 Max 64 GB
GPU: Apple M2 Max 48 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 0.1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 52.56 fps 2X: 34.65 fps 4X: 11.74 fps
Proteus 1X: 42.30 fps 2X: 33.49 fps 4X: 11.09 fps
Gaia 1X: 15.60 fps 2X: 11.50 fps 4X: 09.43 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 41.59 fps APFast: 154.06 fps Chronos: 18.86 fps CHFast: 26.78 fps
1 Like
Thanks very much, Adrian. The speed increase for SD at 10% memory is because it forces the GPU cores to be used for processing rather than only the CPU cores. There is a response from Topaz which gives some explanation:
Processing on M1/M2 Macs is always Neural Engine(NE) first, in almost all cases the NE has similar performance to the GPU at a fraction of power, so it is favored. On the M1/M2 Macs since everything is on a single chip, selecting CPU or M1/M2 will have the same internal selections.
This seems like a bug. It would be great if you can provide more information about this problem. Can you send me logs with memory set to 100% and whatever lower number that is giving you better performance.
Memory …
Thanks again.
Andy
2 Likes
Topaz Video AI v3.3.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900K 127.75 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 23.59 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 193.50 fps 2X: 74.84 fps 4X: 21.38 fps
Proteus 1X: 140.10 fps 2X: 67.18 fps 4X: 20.82 fps
Gaia 1X: 83.83 fps 2X: 61.09 fps 4X: 27.53 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 216.39 fps APFast: 429.27 fps Chronos: 157.62 fps CHFast: 192.57 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.3.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900K 127.75 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 23.59 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 38.91 fps 2X: 15.68 fps 4X: 04.33 fps
Proteus 1X: 30.04 fps 2X: 15.98 fps 4X: 04.08 fps
Gaia 1X: 15.94 fps 2X: 11.03 fps 4X: 04.42 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 39.86 fps APFast: 68.99 fps Chronos: 33.31 fps CHFast: 32.92 fps
1 Like
david.123
June 21, 2023, 1:54am
36
Topaz Video AI v3.3.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor 63.14 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 23.59 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon(TM) Graphics 0.47446 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 41.19 fps 2X: 14.48 fps 4X: 03.81 fps
Proteus 1X: 31.61 fps 2X: 14.09 fps 4X: 03.75 fps
Gaia 1X: 15.72 fps 2X: 10.63 fps 4X: 03.82 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 42.90 fps APFast: 65.31 fps Chronos: 32.27 fps CHFast: 38.47 fps
Awesome performance as always…
Topaz Video AI v3.3.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900K 31.685 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 22.096 GB
GPU: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 770 0.125 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 3840x2160
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 08.42 fps 2X: 03.56 fps 4X: 00.58 fps
Proteus 1X: 06.43 fps 2X: 03.30 fps 4X: 00.62 fps
Gaia 1X: 03.21 fps 2X: 02.23 fps 4X: 00.91 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 14.42 fps APFast: 20.47 fps Chronos: 07.07 fps CHFast: 12.07 fps
XR.FAN
June 22, 2023, 6:02am
38
Topaz Video AI v3.3.1
System Information
OS: Windows v10.2
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 127.91 GB
GPU: Radeon RX Vega 7.9299 GB
GPU: Radeon RX Vega 7.9299 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 06.43 fps 2X: 04.00 fps 4X: 01.59 fps
Proteus 1X: 06.19 fps 2X: 03.88 fps 4X: 01.57 fps
Gaia 1X: 03.05 fps 2X: 01.97 fps 4X: 01.35 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 06.73 fps APFast: 21.54 fps Chronos: 04.51 fps CHFast: 07.12 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.3.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900KF 63.845 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 23.59 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 37.99 fps 2X: 14.64 fps 4X: 03.35 fps
Proteus 1X: 31.88 fps 2X: 13.30 fps 4X: 03.55 fps
Gaia 1X: 15.06 fps 2X: 10.00 fps 4X: 03.86 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 34.92 fps APFast: 62.31 fps Chronos: 31.21 fps CHFast: 28.48 fps
jo.vo
June 22, 2023, 4:28pm
40
Interesting finding
I do have the impression that Video AI isn’t fully optimized for those chips yet and sometimes shows quite strange/erratic behaviour.
With the current 3.3.1 there is a bug when upscaling a video and having RAM set to 100% that it’ll take forever before the actual upscaling process starts as before it’ll not only fill the complete RAM (all 64GB!) but after that also fill the swap space leading to this unnecessary delay and also then slowing things down because of the unnecessary use of swap…
