I wonder why some few get more than double speed on Artemis and Proteus compaired to Gaia.
First run after upgrade to RTX 3060
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Windows v10.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 15.927 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 11.84 GB
Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 8.19 fps 2X: 4.39 fps 4X: 1.32 fps
Proteus 1X: 7.26 fps 2X: 4.17 fps 4X: 1.27 fps
Gaia 1X: 2.95 fps 2X: 1.96 fps 4X: 1.25 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 9.01 fps Chronos: 6.57 fps Chronos Fast: 9.21 fps
1 Like
Artemis and Proteus are limited by CPU, Gaia is limited by GPU.
2 Likes
According to the benchmark.json file, itās using Apollo 6 instead of 8. Not sure how much that matters.
1 Like
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 15.925 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 7.8428 GB
Processing Settings: device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 3840x2160
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 3.03 fps 2X: 1.3 fps 4X: 0.08 fps
Proteus 1X: 2.45 fps 2X: 1.15 fps 4X: 0.13 fps
Gaia 1X: 1.18 fps 2X: 0.78 fps 4X: 0.45 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 3.85 fps Chronos: 2.62 fps Chronos Fast: 4.2 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 15.925 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 7.8428 GB
Processing Settings: device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 13.61 fps 2X: 5.66 fps 4X: 1.57 fps
Proteus 1X: 11.67 fps 2X: 5.08 fps 4X: 1.54 fps
Gaia 1X: 5.38 fps 2X: 3.54 fps 4X: 2 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 12.81 fps Chronos: 11.57 fps Chronos Fast: 16.59 fps
1 Like
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor 63.142 GB
GPU: AMD Radeonā¢ Graphics 0.47445 GB
GPU: AMD Radeonā¢ Graphics 23.944 GB (7900XTX)
Settings: device: 1 vram: 1 instances: 0
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 17.82 fps 2X: 9.76 fps 4X: 3.02 fps
Proteus 1X: 16.16 fps 2X: 9.29 fps 4X: 2.9 fps
Gaia 1X: 8.79 fps 2X: 5.87 fps 4X: 3.63 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 20.22 fps Chronos: 9.99 fps Chronos Fast: 16.9 fps
There is a Beta weāre testing.
This also means that the 4XXX cards will be faster.
It will probably catch up with a 4080/4090 in the future, it would have the basic performance, now only the right software support from AMD is missing.
I also have to say that I am very satisfied with my W6800, I recently had my two Quadro RTX 5000 in the system (from the second system) for testing and it all felt very rubbery, the W6800 on the other hand displays everything very quickly.
Below is the fastest result you can achieve in 3.1.9 with a 3080ti.
How can we now relate this result to the other GPUs? In connection with this CPU?
I did ask ChatGPT about this.
I did copy in some performance numbers from the Forum.
Of course, this is all theoretical.
But itās fun to ask.
The numbers became more and more confused over time.
(Numbers for 3.1.9)
ChatGPT:
Itās difficult to provide an exact estimate as performance can vary based on several factors such as input resolution, processing settings, and the specific AI model being used. However, based on the benchmark results we have for the 3960X with a RTX 3090 and the 13900KF with a RTX 4090, we can make an estimate.
Assuming the same processing settings and input resolution of 1920x1080, and using the theoretical numbers we calculated earlier, we can estimate that the 3960X with a RTX 4090 would achieve around:
- Artemis: 1X - 32.08 fps, 2X - 12.41 fps, 4X - 3.64 fps
- Proteus: 1X - 24.37 fps, 2X - 11.90 fps, 4X - 3.71 fps
- Gaia: 1X - 14.76 fps, 2X - 8.92 fps, 4X - 4.59 fps
- 4X Slowmo: Apollo - 27.50 fps, Chronos - 28.54 fps, Chronos Fast - 34.76 fps
Keep in mind that these are just estimates and actual performance may vary depending on various factors.
1 Like
Hehe, and ChatGPT is often confident, but completely wrong.
4 Likes
Hereās my result with latest beta for those who want to compare
1 Like
My backup system. Will run the benchmark on my main system after finishing season of Drew Carey Iām working on. On this computer, an episode of Drew going from 640x480 to 1920x1080 shows 2.1fps in actual exports using Proteus.
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Windows v10.2009
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9700 CPU @ 3.00GHz 15.84 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 3.8564 GB
GPU: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 630 0.125 GB
Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 1.02 fps 2X: 0.76 fps 4X: ERR fps
Proteus 1X: 1.01 fps 2X: 0.75 fps 4X: ERR fps
Gaia 1X: 0.44 fps 2X: 0.18 fps 4X: ERR fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 2.13 fps Chronos: 0.75 fps Chronos Fast: 1.11 fps
1 Like
My Main system.
Does everyone here always encode FullHD to 4K?
Why not 720x480 or 768x576 (2x is DVD to FullHD)?
1 Like
Not everyone. I upscale to 1080HD almost 100%. Very rare for anything I upscale to go to 4K.
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Mac v11.0704
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9600K CPU @ 3.70GHz 80 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro 580X 8 GB
Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 0.9 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 1.65 fps 2X: 1.07 fps 4X: 0.42 fps
Proteus 1X: 1.69 fps 2X: 1.16 fps 4X: 0.49 fps
Gaia 1X: 0.57 fps 2X: 0.4 fps 4X: 0.31 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 1.76 fps Chronos: 0.31 fps Chronos Fast: 0.58 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Mac v11.0704
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9600K CPU @ 3.70GHz 80 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro 580X 8 GB
Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 0.9 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 9.89 fps 2X: 6.68 fps 4X: 2.91 fps
Proteus 1X: 10.63 fps 2X: 6.43 fps 4X: 2.17 fps
Gaia 1X: 3.58 fps 2X: 2.52 fps 4X: 1.95 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 9.66 fps Chronos: 2.24 fps Chronos Fast: 4.18 fps
1 Like
1080p at 50fps then let the player app enlarge to 4K works best for me.
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-12600K 31.783 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 11.729 GB
GPU: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 770 0.125 GB
Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 103.22 fps 2X: 42.74 fps 4X: 10.95 fps
Proteus 1X: 82.66 fps 2X: 40.8 fps 4X: 11.11 fps
Gaia 1X: 48.34 fps 2X: 30.96 fps 4X: 17.25 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 88.11 fps Chronos: 92.72 fps Chronos Fast: 123.2 fps
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-12600K 31.783 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 11.729 GB
GPU: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 770 0.125 GB
Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 17.92 fps 2X: 6.99 fps 4X: 1.93 fps
Proteus 1X: 14.21 fps 2X: 6.65 fps 4X: 2.06 fps
Gaia 1X: 7.79 fps 2X: 5.21 fps 4X: 2.77 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 19.72 fps Chronos: 16.47 fps Chronos Fast: 23.24 fpsI never upscale to higher than 1080p. I just post those numbers because thatās what everyone else posted.
If I were to come to this topic, trying to figure out if an AMD RX 6900 XT is worth buying for TVAI, because I found one listed locally for sale. It would be pretty useless if the only person who posted results for one, did it in a different resolution than everyone else. Iām kind of hoping they change it in the next version to avoid that situation, but itās a good start either way.
Imac 27"
Topaz Video AI v3.1.9
System Information
OS: Mac v13.0201
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7600K CPU @ 3.80GHz 32 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro 580 8 GB
Processing Settings: device: 2 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 2.78 fps 2X: 1.82 fps 4X: 0.69 fps
Proteus 1X: 2.84 fps 2X: 1.9 fps 4X: 0.68 fps
Gaia 1X: 1.05 fps 2X: 0.75 fps 4X: 0.57 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 2.21 fps Chronos: 0.4 fps Chronos Fast: 0.91 fps
