Notice how your 2X and 4X results suffer from relatively low DDR5-4800 RAM speed @ 1080p. With faster RAM, 2X could be about 10% and 4X about 20% faster. Rhea 4X could gain up to 30%.
- CPU Adaptive Offset: +0.050 V
Are you overvolting? (As opposed to undervolting?)
The ā+ā in front of the adaptive voltage offset of 0.050 sounds like you are adding 50 mVolts additional voltage. I thought adaptive voltage offsets were manual entries but it sounds like you didnāt select/ change that in the BIOS specifically?
Blockquote
Topaz Video AI v5.3.2
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 31.913 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER 15.671 GB
Processing Settings
device: -2 vram: 0.8 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 28.91 fps 2X: 11.75 fps 4X: 03.04 fps
Iris 1X: 26.23 fps 2X: 13.33 fps 4X: 03.62 fps
Proteus 1X: 28.52 fps 2X: 14.02 fps 4X: 03.79 fps
Gaia 1X: 10.79 fps 2X: 07.25 fps 4X: 03.22 fps
Nyx 1X: 12.41 fps 2X: 10.19 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 22.64 fps
Rhea 4X: 02.92 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 32.14 fps APFast: 58.43 fps Chronos: 22.98 fps CHFast: 27.97 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 33.97 fps
For those who may want 7950X ā 9950X, confirmed 2 bugs relative to it
- C-state bug that will be patched with W11 24H2
- Die to Die latency patched with AGESA 1.2.0.2
Both are said to bring significant improves
For gaming it seems Ryzen CPUs perform better on Win10 than Win11. Productivity probably not so much but I see no reason to upgrade to Win 11 with my 7950 atm. Die to Die latency is probably the reason that TVAI often performs better when running on single CCD (besides TVAI not being able to fully utilize more than 8 cores).
Since the 9950 uses the same IMC as previous gen, there is unfortunately no RAM speed bump which I was hoping for.
Still looking forward how the 9950X will perform after all the kinks have been ironed out.
Everything performs better on Win10 ⦠Win11 is a pain for AMD Ryzen.
Microsoft has never hidden his preference for Intel CPUs. Unfortunately, the latter is at the end of its tether. I wonāt bet any buck on Intel long term high end CPU.
First ARM architecture terribly hurts him, and AMD has a string strategy since Zen cores.
To me the problem is not TVAI, because TVAI let the OS handle the core, the problem is the OS. I donāt think TVAI handle in its corner.
I think youāre right, staying Win10 / 7950X is best choice atm.
Indeed the IMC is poor on 9xxx and is also a huge heat generator.
Moreover that crap IMC limits a lot the sweet spot for DDR5, 6000 to 6400 with high end RAM, while Intel easily reach 7000+
Fortunately you can still much lower the latency and Ryzens love this.
As previously the CCD0 is much better than CCD1, but if Windows does shit with it is yet possible to cheat this by software, like it was with 7xxx. Will get a focus on it if time, that I donāt have currently.
Waiting first for 1.2.0.2 for my Aorus, and will cheat CCD with my AV1 purpose.
My primary rig (5800X3D + 4090) is used for VR sim racing and my HP Reverb runs on WMR. Microsoft is removing it from W11 and W10 is losing general support in about a year.
With almost all of the new headsets being stand-alone units, I will just pay for the extended security and hope someone makes a proper PCVR headset that can utilize PC performance natively.
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Mac v15
CPU: Apple M2 8 GB
GPU: Apple M2 5.3333 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 0.25 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 27.00 fps 2X: 17.57 fps 4X: 05.71 fps
Iris 1X: 47.30 fps 2X: 15.07 fps 4X: 03.31 fps
Proteus 1X: 28.34 fps 2X: 21.29 fps 4X: 05.26 fps
Gaia 1X: 10.49 fps 2X: 07.87 fps 4X: 05.78 fps
Nyx 1X: 09.78 fps 2X: 05.90 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 23.11 fps
Rhea 4X: 01.47 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 34.19 fps APFast: 131.42 fps Chronos: 11.44 fps CHFast: 14.52 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 23.46 fps
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) w5-2465X 127.25 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 11.73 GB
GPU: NVIDIA RTX A4000 15.79 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 0.9 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 18.43 fps 2X: 12.76 fps 4X: 03.82 fps
Iris 1X: 19.22 fps 2X: 11.62 fps 4X: 03.30 fps
Proteus 1X: 17.86 fps 2X: 12.50 fps 4X: 04.45 fps
Gaia 1X: 06.15 fps 2X: 04.23 fps 4X: 02.92 fps
Nyx 1X: 07.28 fps 2X: 06.24 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 13.52 fps
Rhea 4X: 02.35 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 24.34 fps APFast: 55.26 fps Chronos: 13.24 fps CHFast: 20.63 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: ERR fps
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Windows v10.22
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core Processor 127.87 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 23.756 GB
Processing Settings
device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 0
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 23.58 fps 2X: 13.89 fps 4X: 03.98 fps
Iris 1X: 22.11 fps 2X: 14.45 fps 4X: 03.89 fps
Proteus 1X: 21.67 fps 2X: 14.34 fps 4X: 04.22 fps
Gaia 1X: 08.15 fps 2X: 05.73 fps 4X: 03.24 fps
Nyx 1X: 10.01 fps 2X: 08.40 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 20.64 fps
Rhea 4X: 02.88 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 31.68 fps APFast: 57.15 fps Chronos: 18.04 fps CHFast: 25.91 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 24.52 fps
iMac 2019
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Mac v15
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9600K CPU @ 3.70GHz 80 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro 580X 8 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 01.56 fps 2X: 00.97 fps 4X: 00.39 fps
Iris 1X: 01.16 fps 2X: 00.67 fps 4X: 00.21 fps
Proteus 1X: 01.45 fps 2X: 01.08 fps 4X: 00.38 fps
Gaia 1X: 00.53 fps 2X: 00.35 fps 4X: 00.24 fps
Nyx 1X: 00.60 fps 2X: 00.56 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 01.74 fps
Rhea 4X: 00.22 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 01.36 fps APFast: 05.61 fps Chronos: 00.29 fps CHFast: 00.51 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 01.42 fps
iMac 2019
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Mac v15
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9600K CPU @ 3.70GHz 80 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro 580X 8 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 720x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 09.19 fps 2X: 06.31 fps 4X: 02.63 fps
Iris 1X: 07.89 fps 2X: 04.77 fps 4X: 01.26 fps
Proteus 1X: 08.44 fps 2X: 06.14 fps 4X: 02.15 fps
Gaia 1X: 03.34 fps 2X: 02.35 fps 4X: 01.81 fps
Nyx 1X: 02.92 fps 2X: 02.67 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 06.63 fps
Rhea 4X: 01.42 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 08.55 fps APFast: 32.67 fps Chronos: 02.20 fps CHFast: 04.09 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 08.77 fps
iMac 2019
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Mac v15
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9600K CPU @ 3.70GHz 80 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro 580X 8 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 640x480
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 09.22 fps 2X: 06.39 fps 4X: 02.61 fps
Iris 1X: 07.88 fps 2X: 04.79 fps 4X: 01.28 fps
Proteus 1X: 08.45 fps 2X: 06.09 fps 4X: 02.24 fps
Gaia 1X: 03.34 fps 2X: 02.35 fps 4X: 01.82 fps
Nyx 1X: 04.14 fps 2X: 03.75 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 09.50 fps
Rhea 4X: 01.41 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 08.63 fps APFast: 29.71 fps Chronos: 02.16 fps CHFast: 04.08 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 09.79 fps
iMac 2019
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Mac v15
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-9600K CPU @ 3.70GHz 80 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro 580X 8 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 480x360
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 14.29 fps 2X: 09.47 fps 4X: 03.64 fps
Iris 1X: 14.35 fps 2X: 08.13 fps 4X: 02.25 fps
Proteus 1X: 15.35 fps 2X: 10.05 fps 4X: 03.57 fps
Gaia 1X: 06.14 fps 2X: 04.35 fps 4X: 03.15 fps
Nyx 1X: 08.28 fps 2X: 06.95 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 17.52 fps
Rhea 4X: 02.53 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 15.16 fps APFast: 51.21 fps Chronos: 03.14 fps CHFast: 05.48 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 13.21 fps
Decided to renew license and upgrade from 5.0.4 despite of all kind of discussion regarding 5.2.x and 5.3.x, hopefully I wonāt regret.
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700K 31.781 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 23.576 GB
GPU: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 770 0.125 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 43.54 fps 2X: 21.47 fps 4X: 05.69 fps
Iris 1X: 40.33 fps 2X: 25.25 fps 4X: 06.29 fps
Proteus 1X: 41.23 fps 2X: 23.32 fps 4X: 06.41 fps
Gaia 1X: 15.73 fps 2X: 10.87 fps 4X: 05.71 fps
Nyx 1X: 17.45 fps 2X: 14.64 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 30.82 fps
Rhea 4X: 05.59 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 43.29 fps APFast: 76.99 fps Chronos: 33.50 fps CHFast: 36.79 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 34.52 fps
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900HX 63.766 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU 11.716 GB
Processing Settings
device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 0
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 17.72 fps 2X: 12.01 fps 4X: 03.81 fps
Iris 1X: 17.51 fps 2X: 12.27 fps 4X: 03.06 fps
Proteus 1X: 16.89 fps 2X: 11.82 fps 4X: 03.93 fps
Gaia 1X: 06.48 fps 2X: 04.49 fps 4X: 02.91 fps
Nyx 1X: 07.76 fps 2X: 06.31 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 13.41 fps
Rhea 4X: 02.68 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 29.20 fps APFast: 02.55 fps Chronos: 15.22 fps CHFast: 21.52 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: ... fps
Finally got the 1.2.0.2 AGESA Bios update ! An it changes ⦠nothing
9950X remains a pure crap ⦠Expo2 introduced limits it all over the way, max frequency, max t°, max , max TFMAX, you have to cheat everything and spend years to a ātheoricalā +14% boost ā¦
This shit will be frozen and fried, thatās all he deserves !
Stay with your 7950X, do not buy a 9950X ![]()
Topaz Video AI v5.3.3
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 63.614 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 23.576 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 35.53 fps 2X: 20.18 fps 4X: 05.55 fps
Iris 1X: 36.59 fps 2X: 24.91 fps 4X: 05.46 fps
Proteus 1X: 35.30 fps 2X: 21.01 fps 4X: 06.10 fps
Gaia 1X: 14.08 fps 2X: 09.66 fps 4X: 05.32 fps
Nyx 1X: 16.01 fps 2X: 13.35 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 27.53 fps
Rhea 4X: 05.09 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 43.28 fps APFast: 89.64 fps Chronos: 28.82 fps CHFast: 38.29 fps
16X Slowmo Aion: 30.04 fps
They should have just skipped Zen 5, itās a joke.
Truelly
Actually, the new scandal right now is the introduction of TFMAX with OPB2.
People donāt know if itās a strategy to free up power for the competition later or a way to hide the weakness of this architecture.
All the best overclockers are trying to break the 35°C barrier, and thatās what Iām going to do by chilling the CPU. For the CPU to be <35°C, my coolant will have to be at least -20° ![]()
I know my limit is -40°C otherwise Iāll go all out and get the -90°C stunt out of the attic, but there the drawbacks are huge ⦠condensation