Nice, first 4080 SUPER benchmark result I’ve seen here. Gives me a good idea of what my results would look like if I were to upgrade from my 3080 since we have similar processors (I have a 5950X).
Thanks, am just testing the 4080 Super now to see how well it works and it seems to me it is CPU limited in my system. It would perform better with faster CPU. On other hand, when encoding mkv in StaxRip using NVEncC encoder, there is no difference from RTX3070. It gives me the same 50FPS ish (no CPU limited in this case)
btw, here is my setup with 4070 Video AI 4.0.X - User Benchmarking Results - #225 by testthewest20
EDIT: there isnt studio driver for W11 for 4080 Super in the moment - I tend to prefer them over game ready drivers.
Topaz Video AI v4.1.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900K 63.71 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 23.576 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 41.51 fps 2X: 21.24 fps 4X: 06.63 fps
Iris 1X: 37.74 fps 2X: 23.05 fps 4X: 06.05 fps
Proteus 1X: 39.77 fps 2X: 23.63 fps 4X: 06.08 fps
Gaia 1X: 14.86 fps 2X: 10.48 fps 4X: 05.52 fps
Nyx 1X: 16.95 fps 2X: 13.81 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 29.98 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 47.36 fps APFast: 83.67 fps Chronos: 32.30 fps CHFast: 36.20 fps
```Completed my new system build...
Topaz Video AI v4.1.0
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900K 63.768 GB
GPU: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 770 0.125 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 15.687 GB
Processing Settings
device: 1 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 26.67 fps 2X: 18.60 fps 4X: 05.93 fps
Iris 1X: 27.85 fps 2X: 17.15 fps 4X: 04.53 fps
Proteus 1X: 25.47 fps 2X: 17.43 fps 4X: 06.05 fps
Gaia 1X: 09.12 fps 2X: 06.27 fps 4X: 04.19 fps
Nyx 1X: 10.82 fps 2X: 09.28 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 19.61 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 38.35 fps APFast: 100.53 fps Chronos: 20.55 fps CHFast: 31.51 fps
Topaz Video AI v4.1.0
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900K 63.768 GB
GPU: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 770 0.125 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 7.8438 GB
Processing Settings
device: 1 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 14.95 fps 2X: 10.75 fps 4X: 03.82 fps
Iris 1X: 14.88 fps 2X: 09.02 fps 4X: 02.74 fps
Proteus 1X: 14.46 fps 2X: 10.47 fps 4X: 03.79 fps
Gaia 1X: 04.97 fps 2X: 03.43 fps 4X: 02.32 fps
Nyx 1X: 05.96 fps 2X: 05.01 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 11.61 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 20.52 fps APFast: 53.05 fps Chronos: 11.26 fps CHFast: 18.04 fps
It looks pretty good for upgrading to 4070ti super.
Has anyone tried the Rtx 4070 super ?
I’m curious with the benchmark .
Topaz Video AI v4.1.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-13700K 31.747 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 23.576 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 43.62 fps 2X: 21.93 fps 4X: 05.89 fps
Iris 1X: 40.73 fps 2X: 24.41 fps 4X: 06.09 fps
Proteus 1X: 43.22 fps 2X: 24.91 fps 4X: 06.23 fps
Gaia 1X: 16.02 fps 2X: 11.08 fps 4X: 05.69 fps
Nyx 1X: 17.80 fps 2X: 15.02 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 31.94 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 45.10 fps APFast: 87.13 fps Chronos: 33.11 fps CHFast: 36.73 fps
“Der8auer” did speak about the costs from some solutions like that if they fail.
A flexible solution is much better.
Topaz Video AI v4.1.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics 15.343 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU 3.8691 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon(TM) Graphics 0.48415 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 04.05 fps 2X: 02.92 fps 4X: 00.97 fps
Iris 1X: 04.03 fps 2X: 02.45 fps 4X: 00.73 fps
Proteus 1X: 03.87 fps 2X: 02.81 fps 4X: 00.99 fps
Gaia 1X: 01.24 fps 2X: 00.87 fps 4X: 00.61 fps
Nyx 1X: 01.56 fps 2X: 01.37 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 03.07 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 05.61 fps APFast: 18.91 fps Chronos: 03.11 fps CHFast: 05.07 fps
Topaz Video AI v4.1.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.22
CPU: 12th Gen Intel(R) Core™ i5-12600K 31.783 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti 11.715 GB
GPU: Intel(R) UHD Graphics 770 0.125 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 23.84 fps 2X: 13.49 fps 4X: 03.16 fps
Iris 1X: 22.82 fps 2X: 14.06 fps 4X: 03.28 fps
Proteus 1X: 21.74 fps 2X: 12.77 fps 4X: 03.87 fps
Gaia 1X: 07.89 fps 2X: 05.45 fps 4X: 03.28 fps
Nyx 1X: 09.23 fps 2X: 07.67 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 16.13 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 30.82 fps APFast: 62.46 fps Chronos: 18.00 fps CHFast: 24.57 fps
Topaz Video AI v4.1.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 31.926 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 7.8301 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 14.51 fps 2X: 09.55 fps 4X: 02.51 fps
Iris 1X: 13.97 fps 2X: 08.48 fps 4X: 02.42 fps
Proteus 1X: 14.03 fps 2X: 09.85 fps 4X: 03.16 fps
Gaia 1X: 04.76 fps 2X: 03.30 fps 4X: 02.20 fps
Nyx 1X: 05.68 fps 2X: 04.74 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 11.04 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 19.39 fps APFast: 49.98 fps Chronos: 10.74 fps CHFast: 17.55 fps
Topaz Video AI v4.1.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core Processor 31.926 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 11.718 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 23.35 fps 2X: 11.22 fps 4X: 02.60 fps
Iris 1X: 26.36 fps 2X: 12.37 fps 4X: 03.14 fps
Proteus 1X: 21.81 fps 2X: 13.09 fps 4X: 03.30 fps
Gaia 1X: 07.47 fps 2X: 05.08 fps 4X: 02.76 fps
Nyx 1X: 08.48 fps 2X: 07.20 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 15.33 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 28.70 fps APFast: 46.62 fps Chronos: 16.41 fps CHFast: 23.36 fps
The 4070 Super is looking quite good here, except for the 4x values. But there it might be the “only” 12 GB RAM or even some kind of CPU / system RAM limitation.
Topaz Video AI v4.1.0
System Information
OS: Windows v10.22
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core Processor 31.946 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 11.718 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER 11.718 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 23.25 fps 2X: 12.11 fps 4X: 03.21 fps
Iris 1X: 25.88 fps 2X: 12.65 fps 4X: 03.37 fps
Proteus 1X: 23.50 fps 2X: 13.03 fps 4X: 03.64 fps
Gaia 1X: 07.36 fps 2X: 05.22 fps 4X: 02.69 fps
Nyx 1X: 08.86 fps 2X: 07.85 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 16.47 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 30.38 fps APFast: 48.48 fps Chronos: 17.19 fps CHFast: 24.46 fps
Intel Arc Driver: 31.0.101.5194
Topaz Video AI v4.1.1
System Information
OS: Windows v11.23
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor 63.927 GB
GPU: Intel(R) Arc(TM) A770 Graphics 15.875 GB
Processing Settings
device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 12.10 fps 2X: 07.49 fps 4X: 02.62 fps
Iris 1X: 00.74 fps 2X: 00.41 fps 4X: 00.13 fps
Proteus 1X: 05.87 fps 2X: 04.92 fps 4X: 02.55 fps
Gaia 1X: 05.71 fps 2X: 04.15 fps 4X: 02.61 fps
Nyx 1X: 00.27 fps 2X: 00.25 fps
Nyx Fast 1X: 07.17 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 08.22 fps APFast: 19.78 fps Chronos: 00NaN fps CHFast: 00NaN fps
Wow. Iris on Intel Arc is even much more underperforming than on Apple Silicon! ![]()
Yes, it’s completely unusable, but at least now the other modes don’t crash all the time. It’s sad that last year they made so much hype for Intel Arc and Topaz also proudly stood by them with many YouTube influencers and a year and a half later the card can’t even reach the level it should be at (3060 for example…). I know it’s not Topaz’s fault, but still, I expected at least 6-7 fps in 2x proteus 1080p.
Thank you for the intel arc numbers. They look quite competitive compared to 4070. Have you tried upscaling fhd to 4k using gaia by any chance? Is the real world performance at all comparable to the benchmarks?
I’d like to make an observation. I’ve tried running topaz on a 4080, 4080s and 7900xtx. the 7900xtx significantly underperformed benchmark numbers. On the machine that I used with a 12900ks and 32gb ddr5 ram, I got about 4.9fps on a real world fhd to 4k upscale with 7900xtx. The 4080 got about 5.5fps, and the 4080s got 5.7fps. All were using the latest drivers. Yet, the benchmarks showed higher numbers for 7900xtx. The testing from techpowerup kinda reflects this – 7900xtx has similar performance to a 4070 ti super.