Could we please have Q setting and not that misleading setting of bitrate for codecs? 4k NVENC h265 high 10 at 0Mb/s (auto) I’m getting ~30Mb/s, at 120Mb/s I’m getting ~40Mb/s.
1 Like
https://community.topazlabs.com/t/video-ai-3-0-0-40a/33029/81
The results were measured with 3.0.0.40a.
As for the changes from 40a to beta and the feel, I don’t think the speed has changed.
1 Like
Craig, thanks for the feedback. Could you also share with me the video used in the screenshot you sent us? You can send it to the same Dropbox folder. Thank you!
Can you please send me your log file when this happens? If it happens with a specific video, please share it as well through Dropbox. Thank you.
There are currently issues when seeking on some videos. We’re working on fixing them. Thanks for the feedback!
Thank you for this suggestion!
I currently have both the VEAI v2.x and the v3. 0b versions on my machine. I will attempt an a/b comparison on the same input. Unfortunately, at present, my time is limited, so it may take a while to get it done and document it.
The setting is the same in v3.0 as it is in v2.6.4 
This option is listed as Max AI Processor Memory Usage in v2.6.4 and as Max Memory Usage in v3.0b
Hey Mike I am happy to extend your license for testing.
Thanks for your contribution, just shoot me a DM and I will take care of you!
1 Like
Hi Marty - this will be fixed in the next update.
1 Like
Hi - just using 100% slowmo (without changing the FPS) would suffice. Just noting that the processing speed will be the same as using 800% and might not minimize motion blur very well. Also, to note, reducing motion blur has nothing to do with setting the slowmo factor and/or FPS. It depends on the input video itself. So it might work but it might not. I hope this helps!
Hi - not at the moment but that’s in our plans for the future.
Ida,
That is interesting news. But it also raises a question. If the setting in both versions actually does the same thing, which is the most appropriate title? The two different titles suggest different things to a user. Which one is the most appropriate?
Also, I my system is only running VEAI, why isn’t it possible to allocate a bigger percentage of GPU runtime to VEAI’s rendering process. On fast systems like mine, this actually makes my underused Nvidia 3090 into the throughout bottleneck.
2 Likes
I haven’t found a single video or format that seeks correctly.
We can reproduce this on a specific video using Enhance or Deinterlace. Could you share this one as well to make sure it’s the same issue we are aware of? You can share it using the same Dropbox folder. Thank you!
Maybe not, but that’s what Topaz chose to do in this case.
Can you send me one of your webm files through Dropbox, please? Thank you.
just sent you a PM/DM about this !
1 Like
Ditto.
I think the problem may have to do with whether placing the timeline pointer is triggering a screen image update reliably. There also appears to be a time lag.
