Topaz Photo AI v0.5

Hi Don - we brought the face detection from Gigapixel AI and subject mask from Sharpen AI. The face detection and subject mask should behave the same with those images in each app respectively. Can you please send me both images through Dropbox so we can add them for future model update trainings? Thank you!

Thanks, Steve. We just added the subject mask to this release but none of the filters use the subject mask yet. We’re planning on adding an option to turn off the mask when desired. If you can send me the image above through Dropbox, that’d be appreciated. Thank you.

Hi - we don’t see any errors in the log files you shared. Can you please tell me what issue you’re running into? Thank you.

Some issues I have noticed are my mouse disappears in both stand-alone and plug-in making it difficult to select anything. Also, the drop-down menus do not work in plug-in mode. Really digging the beta though, it is amazing.

Bad luck! My license for DeNoise, Sharpen, and Gigapixel expired today! :scream: Too bad I didn’t check this thread yesterday! :partying_face:

Hi guys,
I love the product my only request would be to add an option to have scaling numbers fixed and what I mean by that is for example for my workflow I use 2x image scaling almost on all my images because I use the same camera but currently I have to manually change the scaling to 2x each time I open Photo ai, It would be nice to be able to put 2x once and save it as my preference. I’m pretty sure that is how Gigapixel Ai works.
Thank you for the great product.

1 Like

I loaded a set of the same image and 1 face was missed in several of the photos

There’s actually a double-discount sale of the Image Quality Bundle going on through 8/12 (applies to upgrade plans as well).

1 Like

Thanks but that link is for people who do not already own the bundle. The renewal fee is presently $79. But I will wait for Black Friday. Or buy something else…

Hi, I just downloaded to test. I have a number of low light high iso (iso 3200) pictures of hummingbirds taken with a Nikon d7500. When I use Denoise AI followed by Sharpen AI I get a good result. However, with photo AI, the auto feature fails to detect the noise and leaves patchy noisy areas. I need to go in manually and change and have found using strong works the best. The sharpen feature compared to Sharpen AI leaves much to be desired. Comparing to the Denoise AI followed by Sharpen AI, there are a lot of artifacts and crunchy areas. I also do selectively sharpen areas in a photo and this is possible in Sharpen AI. This will be a welcome addition in future renditions of the software. Currently, I think I will stick with my current process and wait until photo AI evolves further.

1 Like

Try this instead and navigate as needed. I’m also revising the link on my site to a wider scope, thanks :wink:

Wow! Great job Topaz! I’ll let you know if I find something to improve on.

1 Like

The renewal is still $79
image

Use the link, use the coupon, let me know:

Screen Shot 2022-08-05 at 1.56.33 PM

1 Like

In general, I find results pretty good, with every image I tested seeing obvious improvement without appearing overly processed. I suspect in some cases the separate programs could yield better result, but the reduced workflow is probably good enough in a lot of cases.

The subject and face identification still has issues but works pretty well most of the time.

The program autopilot at times indicates severe noise but does not apply noise reduction (on) even though noise appears to be improved. Sharpen is rarely turned on in autopilot when at times it probably should be. The enhance option only seems to have minor impact, it is not clear if this is just a different sharpening option or intended to have more impact on specific types of images. Some clarification would help.,

1 Like

Win 11 Pro desktop PC. Processor = AMD. Running .5 Standalone.

The install ran quickly to my PC. Program launched fine. Previews processed w/in seconds (vs. minutes).

Things I’m super excited about in this latest rel.:
1- The ability to make settings changes manually w/out having to turn off the Autopilot switch.

2- The way I can hover on the symbol to the right of Autopilot’s “Subject Detected” to see a temporary overlay of where it sees a subject. The fact it doesn’t remain overlaid is excellent (and should prevent any confusion with a future masking feature…).

3- Ditto, it’s great to see the temporary popup boxes over faces in my photo by hovering over the symbol to the right of the Autopilot’s numerical face count. Having both the quantitative count and seeing with the face detection boxes where the robot thinks the faces are is a great help for post-processing.

I really appreciate that the previous usage inputs from us guys were translated into evolving feature sets for PAI by you guys.

Now, fingers crossed :crossed_fingers:t3: for the Ps plugin. I’ll try that next.

1 Like

I often have the feel that the image is sharped too strong in auto mode even if no sharpening is being applied but also if the sharpening is turned on to the lowest possible setting.

1 Like

That’s funny (in one regard and not another) b/c I always feel as if I still want to add more sharpening to what the DeNoise only Autopilot does. The not so funny part of that is, maybe my eyesight’s going …

1 Like

Con’t. on Win 11 Pro PC. AMD = processor. Ps (2022) Plugin version.

  • The Ps plugin launched okay. And operated in the same ways I noted above for the Standalone.

  • BTW - I forgot to mention wrt the Standalone but I like it a lot for Standalone & Plugin - the notation that says, “Using Autopilot” so we know what’s what in that regard. I also like the toggle notation that comes up if we go ‘off script’ and create manual settings - I value the option that appears to “Reset to Autopilot Settings” if we aren’t so pleased with our noodlings.

  • Autopilot detected 4 faces (temp squares were overlaid on the 4). What they had in common was that all were well-lit, all had relatively lighter skin tones (not all Caucasian, but no darker Blacks) and all were facing straight on to the camera.

  • One face that was somewhat closer to the foreground of the shot (white male) was well-lit and about 2/3 of his face is visible (the person with him is blocking about 1/3 of his face - but it’s clearly a face) was not detected. It seems as though a number of the people in the scene who had darker faces (either darker skin or in shadow) or whose faces were at a partial (~45 degrees) angle were not detected. [Earlier releases were able to detect straight-on, somewhat angled, looking down and profiles].The faces that didn’t get the Autopilot treatment were still sharpened in the processing as part of the overall denoising of the image. Autopilot didn’t activate sharpening. It rarely does.

  • Autopilot classified the jpg image as having “Severe Noise”. I don’t see that. At least not in the conventional sense of photographic noise. It’s a very old photo (2005). And likely from a very low m.p. camera (and way before I studied photog…).

  • The processed image saved to Ps from the PAI plugin. It was improved from the Background layer in Ps. But the output was heavily pixelated. See labelled snip. I’m not sure if that comes from a bad, early gen digital camera’s capture being sharpened or if something else is going on. But one of the terrific benefits of programs like GAI & PAI is being able to breathe new life into old, previously unsalvageable images. This pixelated appearance I got doesn’t really salvage the photo (though it’s a pretty crappy snapshot…).

I notice that resize is only available in the standalone not when used as a plugin in Photoshop. Is that a bug?