Restoring / improving old cell phone photos

Over the last ten years, I have shot around 8000 digital photos in the JPG format, with various cell phones. I have purchased almost every Topaz Lab product available, some of which have similar functions.
Before I begin to restore and improve all of these photographs, I was wondering what you be the best workflow. I was thinking something along this line.

  1. JPEG to RAW AI
  2. Denoise 6 plugin
  3. AI GigaPixel (to enlarge small images, if needed)
  4. Adjustments → AI Clear
  5. Adjustments → Basic Adjustment
  6. Adjustments → Dehaze
  7. Adjustments → Precision Contrast
  8. Restyle plugin

Please let me know your advice.
Thank you,
John.

3 Likes

Hi John,

Sounds like a great way to get more value from old cellphone photos.

Guess the workflow will depend on the quality & resolution of the images you have from your old phones…

For instance, if they were really low res and might be missing some details you might want to experiment with putting the Gigapixel AI into that 1st step because GAI can be helpful intuitively filling in the gaps of missing pixel info in a lot of cases. The point would be to build a more robust starting image before you embark on a more "normal’ post-processing workflow.

You also don’t mention whether you are working in Ps or another host program. Or, strictly Topaz Studio as a standalone product. That could impact your workflow too.

After that GAI application, I personally, would be tempted to run any denoising functionality you prefer. I’m mostly relying on the new DeNoise AI now. But AI Clear, DeNoise 6 or DeHaze can help with cleaning up the image as a good base starting point before you dive into the more “creative” processing options. Essentially you’d be creating a cleaner, sharper image capture simulation with those steps.

For the more creative adjustments and sharpening, then going for the Basic Adjustment and Precision Detail/Precision Contrast can add a bit more personality and potentially restore some texture and structure or dimension to your images (that is if you don’t go too nuts and over-saturate or over-sharpen - a sure sign of over sharpening are little white speckles on your image or the creation of white ‘halos’ around the edges of objects in your images).

If you don’t use a host like Ps CC (which has a camera raw filter option nowadays) then, yes, the jpg to raw program will give you more simulated capability to perform raw adjustments to your image after you denoise. Some of the raw adjustments could be redundant to or duplicative to the adjustments you’d make in “Basic Adjustments”. You’ll have to decide which option works best for which image - but the general rule of thumb is don’t over-process or process more than you have to to achieve the effect you’d like. i.e., If you want to end up with an image that looks like a photo rather than an illustration or digital painting than likely less might be more (either in terms of fewer digital darkroom tools used or a light hand in the tools that are used).

Have fun!

1 Like

I friend recommended processing the cell phone image using JPG to RAW, processing in whatever software you want (LR, PS, Topaz) depending on what you want to correct/enhance, and then using AI Gigapixel LAST to enlarge. What workflow do you think would work best? Or, does it depend on the image?

Hi Georgette,

It would be best if you can get your cellphone images into a visual shape you feel good about before upsizing them using Topaz’s Gigapixel AI. Later in your workflow processes will likely be optimal. But try experimenting using the same image in different software step orders to see which you prefer. In some cases, the image could dictate order. If you find that for some pictures you aren’t getting a desired result by leaving the GAI process to the end, try a different sequence to see if it helps at all.

You might wanna check this out too:

Good luck! Happy photo processing!!

thanks, this is very useful information! I can’t wait to be able to use it in practice.

Nataly,

You might want to chk out Gigapixel as a possible starting pt again in the coming wk or so…

I tried out the trial of JPG to RAW and can’t say it did much good with JPG scans of old colour slides or with poor quality JPGs taken on a 2000 era digital camera. Most reviews of it I have seen on YouTube have not been very positive either. I have no idea whether Topaz plans on upgrading it since it’s not been touched for well over a year. Other Topaz products go into beta every few months.
Gigapixel AI does a much better job, although it still struggles with faces in low res JPGS from way back.
Take a look at what it achieved with this 1999 Kodachrome slide that I scanned more than 15 years ago!