I used the small preview, but I tested again, and it’s working on my end with the big preview
For example, I don’t use Preview at all, because it’s more or less different from the result. True, displaying the whole thing takes more time. Redefine creative often produces nice results for me, but there are artifacts around the photographed object (sometimes a lot). For example, it creates small birds from flowers in the grass, sometimes a flock. Artifacts on the object itself too. I was just improving the blackbird and it still has a generated eye instead of a nostril at the base of the beak. I don’t like the three-eyed blackbird at all.
Redefine is not meant for that type of photo; this is why you get all these artifacts. This tool is too “generative” for nature photography. You can still use the tool to generate textures that you can blend on the original photo if you like.
I see. Yes, I see what you mean.
Ok. Weird when I have a bad result
yes that’s the best way. I always combine 3-4 variants of the image with different model renderings. Often a mixed with High Fidelity, Standard Max, Coated v2 and Subtle Redefine with prompt. For the latter, I make 2 variations. One with the main subject and one with the background/setting. I thus avoid unsightly artifacts on my final mix.
1 Like
