It would be useful to add an option to add the name of AI model to the filename to save, ether additional to or instead of the filter name.
Additional all settings should be (optionally) saved as seperate XML or similar file to reproduce the conversation when reprocessing.
In the export settings, there is a toggle to “Add applied filters to filename” which will change the extension, eg. image-sharpen-enhance.jpg. Let me know if that answers your question.
Thank you for your answer. This option is enabled, and adds “-sharpen” (and other used filters) to filename.
What I want is additional or alternative the model name, for instance
“-standard”, “-standard2”
“-lensblur”
“-strong”
and so on.
1 Like
Would the setting/slider strengths be useful or do you think that’s overkill?
My main concern was first of all to be able to clearly assign and compare the different models in the case of problematic images.
Although certainly desired in part, I fear that this will lead to overkill, especially if all sliders are captured.
I think the best solutions would be:
a. Allow the user to edit a template string, with all parts of settings available as placeholders.
b. Save all settings to a readable (e.g. XML- or JSON-) file which ideally can be read in again by the program during repeated processing (or can be used as template for similar pictures).
(see also feature request store-settings-used-for-image-inside-exif-data-or-next-to-image)
1 Like
That was my concern too, thanks for clarifying.
