Feedback | Wonder 3 Better Then I Could Wish For

I have a 3769x5604 image shot on a Nikon D850 with a 17-55 F2.8 lens at ISO400 with TTL flash at -1, so there’s a little bit of noise on the resulting jpeg. I put it through Wonder 3 at 2x. I was expecting a very long processing time. It finished in a few minutes (it said over 100 minutes) and the result is far better than I could have wished for. My grandson on his 4th birthday with cake in his teeth. The resulting image is 7538x11208 and is 55.3Mb.

Well done Topaz.

So glad you like the result. I will continue improving the model.

3 Likes

I tried Wonder 3 with local processing on the Great Dane sample image and the results weren’t very good. If it was a RAW instead of a JPEG, Lightroom Classic could have done a better job. I wonder (pun intended) if Wonder 3 would do a better job on a raw version of this image? BTW Studio almost always works much better than Lightroom on JPEGs. So I didn’t bother exporting it to test in Lightroom.

Bill

Thanks for your feedback. It will be helpful if you can let me test your image.

It’s not my image. It’s one of the 5 sample images supplied by Topaz with the Studio install. It’s a jpeg and I was wondering if Wonder 3 would do a better job on the raw version of the image.

Bill

Oh I see.