Here is the link to the Before/After comparison tool. It was acting a bit strange and giving me a nonsensical link; hopefully, it’s working correctly now:
Red Dragonfly (another perspective)
It’s not bad.
The improvement is very clean 
.
That’s strange, because I haven’t touched the code lately, nor have I touched the part that generates the sharing links. However, the link you provided is working as expected.
The error definitely wasn’t on your end. Everything else worked fine; it’s just that, instead of a link to my “before/after” dragonfly, it provided a link to some website about soccer in Brazil. The text was in Brazilian Portuguese—a language I don’t know at all—and I have no interest in soccer whatsoever. I tried the same procedure about three times, and eventually, it gave me the correct link. My computer hasn’t been hacked. 
Strange. Perhaps there was an issue with the TinyURL API for a brief moment? It’s hard to say. In any case, when I have the time, I’ll tweak the code to implement my own URL-shortening mechanism, so I no longer have to rely on an external URL-shortening API. So, in principle, no more problems ever again.
By the way, you mentioned that you no longer had the original. And yet, I see that you had uploaded the “before” and “after” versions to my comparison tool via ImgBB.
That said, when you compare them, they aren’t aligned. I’ve aligned them for you using my comparison tool.
Brown Dragonfly.json (3,5 Ko)
Another thing: regarding your second dragonfly, why did you send each image three times? Just out of curiosity?
Also, don’t pay any attention to the blue images that say “Service unavailable.” It’s a visual bug on their server side; if you click on one of the images, the photo displays correctly.
I kept the last 2 and removed the 2 duplicate groups 
.
I’m not sure. I was working with a bunch of photos (sorting, deleting…), and my connection—a very slow WiFi out in the countryside—kept dropping, so I didn’t know what had actually gone through and what hadn’t. I kept trying again, likely unnecessarily in many cases. I hate to cause you any trouble—sorry about that.
It’s no big deal. In any case, there’s no limit to the number of images I can host on my ImgBB account .
I was just asking out of curiosity.
In any case, when there are unused duplicates, I can easily remove them .
Very sharp and detailed. 
Yes, this lens is very very sharp.
If i would process this image again, i wouldn’t make it this sharp.
As always, you have some really nice photos. I didn’t dare get too close for fear of scaring the dragonfly, so I respectfully kept a distance of two meters. Fortunately, I managed to get some shots of the dragonfly from various angles. And while my telephoto lens is certainly not top-of-the-line, it didn’t cost me a fortune either .
That is why AI is a good tool to use subsequently for enhancements, helping to compensate for the quality or reach of telephoto lenses .
New, improved photo. This is a male teal duck.
I used Wonder 3.5, followed by Super Focus v1 (medium setting) and then v2 (also medium). Next, I incorporated the new Flux3 Klein Image model for an even greater enhancement, and blended everything together. Finally, I ran one last pass with Wonder 3.5 using Flux3 Klein Image Edit to increase the output resolution.
Next, here are some of the best photos of Japanese macaques. I used my telephoto lens on my smartphone, so it wasn’t easy to get a sharp photo without a bit of shaking.
First, I used WOnder 3.5, then I used Super Focus v3, and after that, I used Redefine Subtile with a prompt.
Here are the results:
Japanese macaques photo 1
Japanese macaques photo 2
Japanese macaques photo 3
Japanese macaque photo 3
Very nice shots of lovely little monkeys. And regarding the technical side: I like the sharp rendering of details.
Yeah and Thanks .
I used the same improvement method for this photo:
