we might test the processing speed so you get a valid impression if it will be worth the money!
1 Like
I forgot to write an important thing to you! If you run a single process and it runs at 36 fps, but you want to process more videos, then set the max. process to 2! Thus, you will have 23-23 fps per process with the same settings, so you will encode at 46 fps overall, which is much faster than if you were to encode the two videos separately at 36 fps. You have to pay attention to two things: 1. If you change the max. process, when the videos are already in que, then the second process will not start automatically (this should be developed in the program, the developers should be informed about this), therefore only start the process of the first video, then set it to max process 2 set and only after that put the other videos in the que! 2. With the Max. process 3 setting, I did not experience any further acceleration in encoding (12900kf+RTX 4090), so the 2 threads worked for me well.
I do not understand this:
If I enable two processes at the same time, the encoding works at a total of 45 fps. Why does it run at 36 fps when I only allow one process? Idea?
Because itāas a lame code, not enough trained model, beta seeing aplhas release since at least a month.
End of story 
I wait like a kitten the āprofessionalā release. If they got the troubles we do have, for sure it will turn into a big fail.
Pros donāt want crashes, nor random performances
1 Like
The 1-year support (update) period has just expired for me, I will not buy it for the next 1 year for now, because the direction of the developments is not going in the direction that I would need. Frame stabilization and interpolation, upscale to 16k. For what??? Meanwhile, the processing speed with a top PC is very-very weak. If this were to be developed, it would be good for everyone.
I switched from the Proteus model to the Iris. It is much faster and the result is impeccable, even better from SD to fullHD. When running two processes simultaneously, 32/32 fps (i9 12900k+RTX4090)! I will soon build an i9 14900k+RTX4090 machine and test it as well. Has anyone tested the Rhea? What results did you get with it?
i wish i saw numbers that high but generally i see between 3/4.5 going from 1080p to 4k (often 30fps to 60 using Aion) and thats with single pass proteus, av1 10bit on a 7950x3d (64 gigs 6600mt DDR5) and an RTX 4090 (3ghz core & 11.45ghz mem @ avg of 53c after an hour) and usually im pulling video from an gen4 m.2 990 pro and outputting on a Seagate Barracudaā¦
One day lolā¦one day! Perhaps we will see later this year because im probably going to upgrade to a 9950x3d (mmmm oc support for funsies) and a 5090 but ill keep the same sys ram and drives so it will be a good generational upgrade comparisonā¦although i donāt expect much uplift from the cpu (outside of gaming) i do expect to see something from the gpu.
1 Like
cpu : ryzen 7 2700
memoire : 16 go ddr3
gpu : gtx 1660 oc
720 x 576 > 1280 x 720 : 4 fps (proteus v4)
Avoid the 13th and 14th generation of CPUs. Intel confirmed serious issues with these chips. Mine is affected too. When getting a 4090 replace the Nvidia 4:1 adapter and power cord with a beQuiet one to prevent from sudden black screen issues.
1 Like
Nvidia 4:1 adapter? Did you mean a 12VHPWR adapter?
I dunno how it is named exactly. Some call it the Nvidia adapter type Octopus because of its four arms. I changed the attached power cord also. 
Yes, it is. My power supply will have a factory-dedicated 12VHPWR cable in my 14900k configuration.
that is surprising results, I thought CPU would play much greater role in performance, but it seems not. I have a very old CPU, Intel 4th Generation (we are now at 14th generation), 11 years old (Septā 2013), but yet I am getting better fps upscaling & at higher resolution (720p vs. 1080p). probably due to higher GPU.
cpu : intel 4930k-E (Ivy Bridge-E)
Mem: : 32 gb ddr3
gpu : gtx 1080 Ti
720 x 576 > 1440 x 1080 : 11-12 fps (proteus v4)
1 Like
cpu : Intel Core i9 13900K
mem : 32 GB DDR5 @ 6 Ghz
gpu : RTX 4090 OC undervolted 0,875 V @ 2,4 Ghz
720 x 576 > 1280 x 720 : 38 fps (Proteus v4)
I donāt really understand eitherā¦ I think my speeds were faster before. Iāll try reinstalling Windows with just VAI to test. It may just be an option in the BIOS that I skipped or something elseā¦ I donāt really know.
Many months later updateā¦
Nothing has changed lol. I did overclock the CPU to 5.45ghz CCD0 & 5.9ghz CCD1 on the 7950x3d and lowered my GPU memory clock to 11ghz for stability in some games but overall performance is still generally 4ish fps 720/1080p30> 4k60 with single enhancement Proteus and Aion. Chronos is of course a bit faster depending on the video.
Really itching for nVidia to hurry up with the 5090 to see if there is any topaz improvements but mostly itās because Iāve been working on my own image creation LLM model recently
1 Like
When using Proteus, I found that changing the GPU to a higher performance did not increase the fps significantly. It can be stated that Proteus is a poorly optimized model. Switching to the Iris model brought a significant fps increase for me. I have found that Iris produces a better quality image than Proteus, and it works much faster. Replacing the CPU with a higher performance one also brought a significant increase. You have own model? Interesting.
Wellā¦ Sorta. Itās based on some open source models from about a year ago but Iāve done so much to change it that it might as well just be all new. Itās just something to learn with and mess around really
1 Like
When I changed the VGA from RTX 3080 to 4090 in my 12900k PC, I noticed that the processing speed increased very little. From this I deduced that the speed depends more on the CPU than the GPU. BUTā¦ I transferred the 4090 VGA from my 12900k PC to my 14900k PC and it has exactly the same processing speed for the same source video, with the same fullHD output, with the same model settings. Now Iām confused. I donāt understand what affects the processing speed actually.
