# Topaz Video AI Performance Alpha 3.2.0.3.a

**URL:** <https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762>\
**Category:** Video AI Beta\
**Created:** [March 17, 2023, 7:47pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762 "2023-03-17T19:47:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![suraj](https://community.topazlabs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@suraj](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/suraj)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 7:47pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/1 "2023-03-17T19:47:47Z")

</div>

Hi All,

Here is an early version of app that should improve performance for all machines. The degree of performance increase will vary. This version should also allow for better support running multiple filters and multiple processes.  
Please let us know if you have any issues using the app.

Download: [Win](https://downloads.topazlabs.com/deploy/TopazVideoAIAlpha/3.2.0.3.a/TopazVideoAIAlpha-3.2.0.3.a.msi) | [Mac](https://downloads.topazlabs.com/deploy/TopazVideoAIAlpha/3.2.0.3.a/TopazVideoAIALPHA-3.2.0.3.a.dmg) | [Mac Update](https://downloads.topazlabs.com/deploy/TopazVideoAIAlpha/3.2.0.3.a/TopazVideoAIALPHA-3.2.0.3.a.pkg)

Please upload problem videos and logs here: [Submit Files](https://www.dropbox.com/request/hxLNzpT1g3nsCHG4iM2E)

**Changes from 3.2.0.2.a**

- Proteus Auto/Estimate works now
- Running single process should be faster for non RTX GPUs (Max Processes = 1)
- GUI updates from 3.1.9 and beyond

Thank you for testing

PS: Since this is an alpha version, it will not interfere with Beta or Release versions on the machine.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![suraj](https://community.topazlabs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@suraj](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/suraj)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 7:52pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/2 "2023-03-17T19:52:09Z")

</div>



---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/david.123/32/163156_2.png) [@david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/david.123)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 7:57pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/3 "2023-03-17T19:57:27Z")

</div>

Sir, your team is running like a well oiled machine! Cranking out these updates, love it!

Rome is coming along nicely!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/david.123/32/163156_2.png) [@david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/david.123)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 8:07pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/4 "2023-03-17T20:07:26Z")

</div>

Looks like the ‘grey interpolated frames’ issue is still present. Known issue on the dev side of things?

All interpolated frames come out like this:

 ![image](https://community-cdn.topazlabs.com/original/3X/7/3/73f6e3e60d4fec7cb50c893acec5cd519a34cd50.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![suraj](https://community.topazlabs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@suraj](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/suraj)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 9:35pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/5 "2023-03-17T21:35:45Z")

</div>

Is this only happening in the alpha or the release version as well?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/david.123/32/163156_2.png) [@david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/david.123)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 11:06pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/6 "2023-03-17T23:06:24Z")

</div>

Only in the alpha (is in the previous alpha and possibly earlier too).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/david.123/32/163156_2.png) [@david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/david.123)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 11:08pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/7 "2023-03-17T23:08:01Z")

</div>

Was first reported here:

> [@Topaz Video AI Performance Alpha for Windows Nvidia & AMD GPUs](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-for-windows-nvidia-amd-gpus/40961/20):
>
> With 360p → 720p (that destroyed D&D cartoon FTW!) I see quite an increase, from around ~34fps in latest v3.1.7 stable, to ~45fps in this alpha. That’s on RTX 3090, 100% memory set, on i9 7940X CPU (fairly old one) and 64GB of RAM. Preview parameters: ffmpeg “-hide\_banner” “-nostdin” “-y” “-nostats” “-t” “15” “-ss” “103.736” “-i” “W:/Video/Dungeons & Dragons Episode 19 The Last Illusion.mp4” “-flush\_packets” “1” “-sws\_flags” “spline+accurate\_rnd+full\_chroma\_int” “-color\_trc” “2” “-colorspace” “…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/david.123/32/163156_2.png) [@david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/david.123)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 11:08pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/8 "2023-03-17T23:08:42Z")

</div>

Release version does not have this issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mikmod1](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/mikmod1/32/239469_2.png) [@mikmod1](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/mikmod1)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2023, 11:15pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/9 "2023-03-17T23:15:47Z")

</div>

Only in two previous alpha versions, so far. Testing with 3.2.0.3.a now.

Edit: This alpha has the issue as well.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![xl5](https://community.topazlabs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/x/76d3ee/32.png) [@xl5](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/xl5)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 1:10am UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/12 "2023-03-18T01:10:02Z")

</div>

I’m finding it hard to keep up with all these Alpha and Beta releases that I’m not sure which one is the best for doing certain tasks I want to complete? I guess the idea is to try something on both and then decide which is better, therefore instead of doing an entire video of (say) 30 minutes, just take a five minute segment and test it on each.

Keep up the wonderful work!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/david.123/32/163156_2.png) [@david.123](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/david.123)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 1:15am UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/13 "2023-03-18T01:15:22Z")

</div>

Stick with the release versions if you actually need consistent results, the point of the Alphas and Betas is to test early features and find bugs, if any. Not recommended to use as your daily driver.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![toby.riding](https://community.topazlabs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/t/eb9ed0/32.png) [@toby.riding](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/toby.riding)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 3:04am UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/14 "2023-03-18T03:04:06Z")

</div>

```auto
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.3.a
System Information
OS: Mac v13.0201
CPU: Apple M1 Ultra 64 GB
GPU: Apple M1 Ultra 48 GB
Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 0.5 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 14.09 fps 2X: 8.35 fps 4X: 3.06 fps 	
Proteus 1X: 12.23 fps 2X: 7.5 fps 4X: 2.63 fps 	
Gaia 1X: 4.07 fps 2X: 3.03 fps 4X: 2.39 fps 	
4X Slowmo Apollo: 14.23 fps Chronos: 3.69 fps Chronos Fast: 5.54 fps 	

```

Slightly faster on most models, slightly slower on the others compared to the previous beta, not even the previous alpha version… just so you know & have the benchmark data with this alpha version. Nothing more nothing less!! 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TPX](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/tpx/32/194727_2.png) [@TPX](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/TPX)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 9:26am UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/15 "2023-03-18T09:26:08Z")

</div>

```auto
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.3.a
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-Core Processor 127.88 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon PRO W6800 29.618 GB
Processing Settings: device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 10.11 fps 2X: 5.99 fps 4X: 2.07 fps 	
Proteus 1X: 9.36 fps 2X: 5.89 fps 4X: 2.02 fps 	
Gaia 1X: 4.73 fps 2X: 3.18 fps 4X: 2.19 fps 	
4X Slowmo Apollo: 12.19 fps Chronos: 5.56 fps Chronos Fast: 10.06 fps 	

```

![Screenshot 2023-03-18 102258](https://community-cdn.topazlabs.com/original/3X/0/7/07a5b3831bb1762e9995ab67ce57a62d2457e844.png)

* * *

![Screenshot 2023-03-11 121126](https://community-cdn.topazlabs.com/original/3X/1/4/14a80d523c488455c862d412567aff728d07c7c2.png)  
3.2.0.1a

* * *

![Screenshot 2023-03-16 153518](https://community-cdn.topazlabs.com/original/3X/9/8/98a99779c2795e1a6e5f8422a888c609526782e4.png)  
3.1.9

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TPX](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/tpx/32/194727_2.png) [@TPX](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/TPX)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 9:31am UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/16 "2023-03-18T09:31:21Z")

</div>

@suraj could we get a benchmark for Photo A.I. too?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joachim.ehrhardt](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/joachim.ehrhardt/32/76638_2.png) [@joachim.ehrhardt](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/joachim.ehrhardt)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 9:31am UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/17 "2023-03-18T09:31:58Z")

</div>

```auto
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.3.a
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 31.916 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 11.845 GB
Processing Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 9.06 fps 2X: 5.84 fps 4X: 1.31 fps 	
Proteus 1X: 8.29 fps 2X: 5.53 fps 4X: 1.37 fps 	
Gaia 1X: 3.14 fps 2X: 2.12 fps 4X: 1.38 fps 	
4X Slowmo Apollo: 6.87 fps Chronos: 6.94 fps Chronos Fast: 11.43 fps 	

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joachim.ehrhardt](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/joachim.ehrhardt/32/76638_2.png) [@joachim.ehrhardt](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/joachim.ehrhardt)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 9:40am UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/18 "2023-03-18T09:40:05Z")

</div>

**Why is Proteus Auto 15% slower than Proteus Manual, 4.4 fps versus 5.2 using same video ?**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alanhusband-677420](https://community.topazlabs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/7ba0ec/32.png) [@alanhusband-677420](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/alanhusband-677420)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 12:41pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/19 "2023-03-18T12:41:09Z")

</div>

“Auto” vs “Manual”.

“Calculating parameters for each frame” vs “fixed parameters set by the user”.

The extra calculations will have additional performance penalty.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joachim.ehrhardt](https://community.topazlabs.com/user_avatar/community.topazlabs.com/joachim.ehrhardt/32/76638_2.png) [@joachim.ehrhardt](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/joachim.ehrhardt)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 12:57pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/20 "2023-03-18T12:57:36Z")

</div>

are you sure that “Auto” calculates parameters frame by frame?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alanhusband-677420](https://community.topazlabs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/7ba0ec/32.png) [@alanhusband-677420](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/alanhusband-677420)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 1:13pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/21 "2023-03-18T13:13:11Z")

</div>

We know that the parameters change over time based on the video content with “Auto”. So there must be some frame analysis calculations occuring. Otherwise what’s the point of “Auto”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JesusSheep](https://community.topazlabs.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/ec9cab/32.png) [@JesusSheep](https://community.topazlabs.com/u/JesusSheep)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2023, 2:26pm UTC](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762/22 "2023-03-18T14:26:09Z")

</div>

```auto
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.3.a
System Information
OS: Mac v13.0201
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7600K CPU @ 3.80GHz 32 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon Pro 580 8 GB
Processing Settings: device: 2 vram: 1 instances: 1
Input Resolution: 1920x1080
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 2.62 fps 2X: 1.75 fps 4X: 0.67 fps 	
Proteus 1X: 2.91 fps 2X: 1.94 fps 4X: 0.8 fps 	
Gaia 1X: 1.02 fps 2X: 0.72 fps 4X: 0.55 fps 	
4X Slowmo Apollo: 2.49 fps Chronos: 0.3 fps Chronos Fast: 0.7 fps 	

```

[Next page](https://community.topazlabs.com/t/topaz-video-ai-performance-alpha-3-2-0-3-a/41762.md?page=2)
