Topaz Video AI Beta v3.1.9.0.b
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 63.921 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 7.8154 GB
Settings: device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 1
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 10.55 fps 2X: 6.28 fps 4X: 1.62 fps
Proteus 1X: 9.23 fps 2X: 5.21 fps 4X: 1.63 fps
Gaia 1X: 3.55 fps 2X: 2.36 fps 4X: 1.49 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 8.04 fps Chronos: 3 fps Chronos Fast: 12.52 fps
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 63.921 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 7.8154 GB
Settings: device: -2 vram: 1 instances: 0
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 9.72 fps 2X: 6.26 fps 4X: 1.93 fps
Proteus 1X: 8.91 fps 2X: 5.8 fps 4X: 1.89 fps
Gaia 1X: 3.6 fps 2X: 2.36 fps 4X: 1.54 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 8.9 fps Chronos: 3.2 fps Chronos Fast: 13.09 fps
2 Likes
Topaz Video AI Beta v3.1.9.0.b
System Information
OS: Windows v10.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor 63.909 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 23.77 GB
Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 16.59 fps 2X: 7.37 fps 4X: 1.95 fps
Proteus 1X: 13.38 fps 2X: 6.4 fps 4X: 1.95 fps
Gaia 1X: 6.8 fps 2X: 4.43 fps 4X: 2.42 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 17.56 fps Chronos: 14.32 fps Chronos Fast: 16.18 fps
your problem will be solved in few days, not mine lol.
1 Like
That’s encouraging to see a 7950X on 65W can beat a 13900k (and the 4090 on 250w as well). I was concerned that to unlock the full potential of this, the system would suck back 600-800w under load.
1 Like
TPX
(Thomas K.)
March 11, 2023, 11:13am
31
TPX:
How the 4090 erodes through here.
@suraj i had to force it to download the models by run them before benchmarking.
I try now a uninstaller software to wipe out everything from TL, last try.
Using Ashampoo uninstaller and deinstall everything from TL, it did finally download the models by itself.
@suraj could you add mhz and type (DDR4/5) of RAM too, and Resolution of Benchmark Video (people want to know).
3 Likes
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Windows v10.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor 31.915 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 15.954 GB
Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 10.54 fps 2X: 5.95 fps 4X: 2.04 fps
Proteus 1X: 9.41 fps 2X: 5.88 fps 4X: 2.01 fps
Gaia 1X: 5.33 fps 2X: 3.55 fps 4X: 2.23 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 13.73 fps Chronos: 5.86 fps Chronos Fast: 10.6 fps
This version puts a 6900XT slightly ahead of a 3090 on the curernt beta!
1 Like
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Windows v10.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor 63.909 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 23.77 GB
Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 16.74 fps 2X: 9.07 fps 4X: 2.83 fps
Proteus 1X: 14.96 fps 2X: 8.21 fps 4X: 2.71 fps
Gaia 1X: 6.16 fps 2X: 4.1 fps 4X: 2.53 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 17.92 fps Chronos: 14.74 fps Chronos Fast: 23.81 fps
40% performance uplift with the Alpha compared to the latest beta! Very nice
1 Like
This is my 2nd benchmark, while running an other video
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Windows v11.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-Core Processor 31.916 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 11.845 GB
Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 3.98 fps 2X: 2.98 fps 4X: 0.95 fps
Proteus 1X: 3.97 fps 2X: 2.98 fps 4X: 0.95 fps
Gaia 1X: 1.31 fps 2X: 0.89 fps 4X: 0.61 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 4.83 fps Chronos: 2.83 fps Chronos Fast: 4.76 fps
TPX
(Thomas K.)
March 11, 2023, 11:27am
35
In fact, you can compare very well.
Now it would be interesting with a weaker GPU and a fast CPU, maybe someone else will show up.
Topaz Video AI Beta v3.1.9.0.b
System Information
OS: Mac v13.0201
CPU: Apple M1 Ultra 64 GB
GPU: Apple M1 Ultra 48 GB
Settings: device: -2 vram: 0.8 instances: 1
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 10.59 fps 2X: 6.64 fps 4X: 2.24 fps
Proteus 1X: 10.82 fps 2X: 5.99 fps 4X: 2.2 fps
Gaia 1X: 4.17 fps 2X: 2.92 fps 4X: 2.53 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 7.47 fps Chronos: 3.87 fps Chronos Fast: 4.32 fps
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Windows v10.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 31.912 GB
GPU: NVIDIA RTX A4000 14.817 GB
Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 10.8 fps 2X: 6.45 fps 4X: 1.7 fps
Proteus 1X: 9.93 fps 2X: 5.98 fps 4X: 1.69 fps
Gaia 1X: 3.93 fps 2X: 2.7 fps 4X: 1.59 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 9.05 fps Chronos: 9.07 fps Chronos Fast: 14.03 fps
1 Like
tony11
(Tony)
March 11, 2023, 2:26pm
39
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Windows v10.2009
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Six-Core Processor 31.927 GB
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 11.816 GB
Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 0
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 13.34 fps 2X: 6.65 fps 4X: 1.94 fps
Proteus 1X: 11.23 fps 2X: 5.94 fps 4X: 1.88 fps
Gaia 1X: 6.26 fps 2X: 4.34 fps 4X: 2.22 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 13.03 fps Chronos: 14.63 fps Chronos Fast: 18.36 fps
Solo benchmark test
2 Likes
@tony11
comparing your benchmark results with those on my Ryzen 5800 8-Core processor @ 4.2GHz with an NVIDIA RTX 3060 @1.867GHz .
Your results are significantly better than my benchmarks,
it demonstrates that a stronger GPU is more important for TVAI than CPU.
2 Likes
I just ran the benchmark again with HWMonitor open, and even the 13900K cycles between only 40W-80W while running the benchmark. This benchmark doesn’t do any encoding, although if you use the GPU hardware encoder it won’t add a ton of extra wattage.
I should have also mentioned that I similarly power limit my 4090, because the 450W default is dumb. I just tried benchmark runs at 100% power target for the 4090, and the performance results didn’t increase at all.
bnumerick
(bnumerick)
March 11, 2023, 4:26pm
43
For fun I thought I’d test running the old Mac Pro using the all GPUs setting. Unlike in the older 2.x software this did look like using both GPUs about doubled performance. I have some eGPU enclosures I’ll test out when I’m in that location and a couple of AMD 6800/6900xt. Will be interesting to see how that does compared to the new Macs.
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Mac v12.0603
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz 64 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon HD - FirePro D300 2 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon HD - FirePro D300 2 GB
Settings: device: 2 vram: 1 instances: 1
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 0.7 fps 2X: 0.48 fps 4X: 0.2 fps
Proteus 1X: 0.69 fps 2X: 0.45 fps 4X: 0.17 fps
Gaia 1X: 0.17 fps 2X: 0.12 fps 4X: 0.1 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 0.64 fps Chronos: 0.15 fps Chronos Fast: 0.35 fps
So, it can as much as possible come to such extreme values as you turn on 3-4 files at once. ;D
domdom
(domdom)
March 11, 2023, 4:32pm
45
Here are my results on Mac Studio:
Topaz Video AI Beta v3.1.9.0.b
System Information
OS: Mac v13.03
CPU: Apple M1 Max 32 GB
GPU: Apple M1 Max 21.333 GB
Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 7.35 fps 2X: 4.83 fps 4X: 1.93 fps
Proteus 1X: 7.12 fps 2X: 4.87 fps 4X: 1.61 fps
Gaia 1X: 2.46 fps 2X: 1.61 fps 4X: 1.34 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 4.53 fps Chronos: 2.3 fps Chronos Fast: 3.93 fps
bnumerick
(bnumerick)
March 11, 2023, 4:39pm
46
What driver are you using? I’ve tried running it on a similar machine a few times and the driver keeps hanging. I just updated it to the latest after the previous drive was hanging and same issue.
domdom
(domdom)
March 11, 2023, 4:52pm
47
updated to performance alpha release on Mac Studio
Topaz Video AI Alpha v3.2.0.1.a
System Information
OS: Mac v13.03
CPU: Apple M1 Max 32 GB
GPU: Apple M1 Max 21.333 GB
Settings: device: 0 vram: 1 instances: 1
Benchmark Results
Artemis 1X: 7.67 fps 2X: 4.97 fps 4X: 2.02 fps
Proteus 1X: 7.33 fps 2X: 4.64 fps 4X: 1.78 fps
Gaia 1X: 2.36 fps 2X: 1.65 fps 4X: 1.38 fps
4X Slowmo Apollo: 4.52 fps Chronos: 2.29 fps Chronos Fast: 4.03 fps