My conclusion from the following anedotal evidence is, "Won’t it be nice to have a memory timing metric built into the Benchmarking test. It would add to the 11 main model tests that have collective 23 subparts.
In the Benchmark reports, I can’t isolate the impact of things that aren’t measures. Like memory specs:
Type – DDR4, DDR5
Speed, which could be from DDR4 2133 MHz to 3200 MHz to DDR5 4800 MHz to 8400 MHz, a spread of about 4X.
I would imaging that perhaps the SSD speed would matter, but maybe not. I don’t have any measure like a Samsung Magician might give.
I am just sitting on the sidelines so I may have entirely have misread or misunderstood comments in the Video AI 6.2.X User Benchmark (I realize there are 7.0.X and 7.2.X results that I just haven’t yet analyzed.)
Topaz257 comments to socialhobby9, toole-3526 and masterzh7 revolve around RAM. For example:
socialhobby9:
toole-3526 :
toole-3526 posts AIDA64 memory tests:
And comments:
masterzh7:
Comments: Expected more improvement with new machine over old.
“old PC of i7-10700 and RTX 4060 Ti (16GB)”
"new machine “Ultra 9 285K 64 GB RTX 5090 32 GB”
topaz257: speculate regarding RAM timing and possible bottleneck:
"I also wonder about RAM speeds because in theory 6400CL32 doesn’t sound too slow but all your results which involve 4X scaling are pretty low which indicates a RAM speed bottleneck. "
